APMG-International Change Management Foundation Exam Change-Management-Foundation Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (October 2025)

A vision statement for a change is a concise and compelling description of the desired future state that the change aims to achieve. A vision statement should have several characteristics, such as being clear, inspiring, realistic, and verifiable. Being verifiable means that the vision statement can be measured and confirmed when it is achieved. The other options are not desired characteristics of a vision statement, as they are either too detailed, vague, or irrelevant.References: https://apmg-international.com/sites/default/files/Change%20Management%20Foundation%20Sample%20Paper%2014%20-%20v1.0.pdf (page 11)

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

John Kotter’s 8-Step Process for Leading Change is a foundational model in the APMG Change Management Foundation. The question targets reducing doubters’ impact via early achievements. Let’s analyze each step:

•Kotter’s Model Overview: The 8 steps are: 1) Create urgency, 2) Build a coalition, 3) Form a vision, 4) Communicate the vision, 5) Empower action, 6) Generate short-term wins, 7) Consolidate gains, 8) Anchor changes. Each builds momentum, but one specifically counters skepticism with tangible results.

•Option A: Building and maintaining a guiding coalition – Step 2 forms a committed group to lead change. It’s foundational but focuses on team-building, not proving success to doubters. For example, assembling influencers doesn’t show results yet.

•Option B: Creating a sense of urgency around a single big opportunity – Step 1 motivates action by highlighting needs (e.g., “We’ll lose customers without this”). It generates buy-in but lacks tangible achievements to sway skeptics.

•Option C: Accelerating movement towards the vision – This aligns with Step 7 (consolidating gains), pushing progress. While it builds on wins, it’s about sustaining momentum, not the initial demonstration to doubters.

•Option D: Celebrating visible, significant short-term wins – Step 6 and the correct answer. Kotter emphasizes that early, visible successes (e.g., a pilot project cutting costs) prove the vision’s viability, silencing critics. The APMG framework notes this counters resistance by showing “it works.” For instance, a new process reducing complaints by 20% in a month can shift doubters’ views.

•Why D Fits: Doubters need evidence, not promises. Celebrating wins provides that proof, reinforcing belief and momentum, as Kotter and APMG stress.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The Measurement methodology in APMG evaluates communication success (e.g., awareness levels via surveys), ensuring it meets goals. Option A fits; others misalign.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Neuroscience insights in the APMG Change Management Foundation highlight how the brain learns during change. Statement 1 ("Following moments of insight, offer supportive feedback") is true, as research (e.g., Rock’s AGES model) shows that reinforcing insights with feedback strengthens neural pathways, aiding learning. Statement 2 ("Positive informative talks from experts") lacks specific neuroscience backing in this context; while informative, it’s not highlighted as a key learning enhancer compared to feedback after insight. Thus, only Statement 1 is true.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Force Field Analysis in APMG identifies driving/restraining forces (1—true), but requires collaboration, not solo creation (2—false). A is correct.

When assessing the severity of change impacts during a stakeholder impact assessment, one of the criteria that can be used is the coverage of impact. The coverage of impact refers to the proportion of a given stakeholder group that are impacted by a change. For example, if a change affects 80% of the employees in a department, the coverage of impact is high. The other options are not criteria for assessing the severity of change impacts, but rather factors or outcomes of other processes or activities in the change process

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The APMG Change Management Foundation identifies Transparency as one of four engagement principles (alongside Inclusivity, Connectivity, and Dialogue). Sharing information about "why change is necessary and when it will take place" exemplifies Transparency (Option C), as it involves openly communicating critical details to build trust and clarity. Inclusivity (A) focuses on involving people, Connectivity (B) on linking stakeholders, and Empathy (D) on understanding emotions—none of which directly address the act of sharing information as described.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The 'change curve' (based on Kübler-Ross’s model) describes emotional stages individuals experience during change: shock, denial, frustration, depression, experiment, decision, and integration. The APMG Change Management Foundation stresses proactive support to guide people through these stages effectively. Option A ("Actively involve line managers in listening and providing support") is recommended because line managers are well-positioned to offer personalized support, listen to concerns, and help staff navigate emotions—key to moving through the curve. Option B misinterprets negative emotions as a management failure rather than a natural response, Option C isolates individuals, and Option D is passive and unsupported by the framework.

According to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), thinking is one of the four preference pairs that describe how people interact with the world and make decisions. Thinking refers to preferring to use logic, analysis, and objective criteria to select an outcome. The other options are not preferences, but dimensions of preferences. Introvert and perceiving are opposite to extrovert and judging, respectively, while feeling is opposite to thinking.References: https://apmg-international.com/sites/default/files/Change%20Management%20Foundation%20Sample%20Paper%2019%20-%20v1.0.pdf (page 11)

Communication channels can be classified as lean or rich, depending on the amount and quality of information they can convey. A rich communication channel allows for conversation, a quick response, and the chance for interaction, as well as conveys non-verbal cues, such as emotion and feelings, tone or gestures. Examples of rich communication channels are face-to-face meetings, video calls, or phone calls. Therefore, both statements 1 and 2 are true. References: https://apmg-international.com/sites/default/files/Change%20Management%20Foundation%20Sample%20Paper%2015%20-%20v1.0.pdf (page 11)