Cisco Designing and Implementing Secure Cloud Access for Users and Endpoints (SCAZT) 300-740 Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (October 2025)

After Cloudlock is integrated with Salesforce, full visibility into objects and data requires that Cloudlock has the “View All Data” permission enabled on the connected Salesforce account. This permission allows the Cloudlock API connection to access all user data, regardless of individual field-level or sharing rules. Without it, Cloudlock will be limited in its visibility scope.

As per SCAZT (Section 4: Application and Data Security, Pages 86–89), integration with SaaS platforms like Salesforce must include enabling comprehensive data visibility to perform effective risk analysis and policy enforcement.

The screenshot from Cisco ISE shows a configuration of a “File Condition” posture check that verifies the existence and version of the “Srv.sys” file in the System32 directory. This is a known method to validate if a Windows device has received a critical security patch (in this case, one related to protection against the WannaCry vulnerability, MS17-010). Cisco ISE does not rely solely on a patch management system for this type of validation but can use specific file version and path checks. Therefore, the correct posture condition is File Condition.

The exhibit shows DNS Block as the reason and lists 10.1.108.100 as the Responder IP, with the Initiator being 10.1.113.7. In Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center reports, the “Initiator IP” is the source of the request and the “Responder IP” is the source of the response. Since the DNS security intelligence engine flagged the traffic, and 10.1.108.100 was the responder, the blocked traffic corresponds to a DNS response from that IP.

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly AMP for Endpoints) includes an “Inbox” tab where detected threats and flagged endpoints are listed. When Duo Trusted Endpoints integration is in place, an endpoint may be denied access if it fails posture checks. The correct workflow includes reviewing the machine’s status in Cisco Secure Endpoint and marking the incident as “Resolved” in the Inbox tab to restore authentication.

This process is described in SCAZT Section 2 (User and Device Security, Pages 44–46) for enforcing endpoint trust with Secure Endpoint and Duo Trusted Endpoints integration.

From the firewall access rules provided, Rule 1 allows traffic from 20.1.1.10 (GCP VM) to 20.1.1.1 using HTTPS. However, this destination is not the actual mail server—the mail server resides at 192.168.200.10 (inside network). Therefore:

A: Rule 1 must be updated to reflect the correct destination: 192.168.200.10. Without this change, traffic is not permitted to the mail server.

D: NAT (Network Address Translation) is needed to translate the external address (e.g., 20.1.1.10) to access internal addresses (like 192.168.200.10). As per SCAZT and Cisco firewall policies, NAT enables proper packet delivery from public to private zones.

Rule 2, which denies all other traffic, is correctly placed after the specific allow rule. Therefore, moving it (Option B) would not help, and Options C and E are unrelated to resolving the immediate firewall access and routing issue.

When integrating Duo Authentication Proxy with Active Directory for multifactor authentication (MFA), you must:

Configure the Identity Source in the Duo Admin Panel as Active Directory (not SAML), since it’s using the Authentication Proxy.

Configure the authentication proxy settings in the [sso] section to communicate with both AD and the Duo cloud.

This setup allows Active Directory to be the primary identity store while Duo provides the second authentication factor.

The Secure Cloud Analytics alert log shows multiple SSH connections on port 22 from diverse and geographically distributed IP addresses targeting a single GCP instance (www-gcp-east-4c). According to the Cloud Analytics alert logic described in SCAZT (Section 6: Threat Response, Pages 113–116), this behavior indicates “Geographically Unusual Remote Access.” It typically triggers when a host receives connections from countries not normally associated with the network’s usage profile. This is often linked to reconnaissance or brute-force SSH attempts.

In Cisco ASA configurations using IKEv2, the integrity command defines the hash algorithm. To use SHA-512, the correct syntax is:

integrity sha512

Without this, the IKEv2 proposal is considered incomplete or mismatched with the peer. The encryption command sets encryption (AES-256, etc.), not hashing. The correct structure is:

crypto ikev2 policy <#>

encryption aes-256

integrity sha512

group 2

prf sha512

lifetime 86400

In IKEv1 policy configuration for Cisco ASA, two key commands are required to define the encryption and hashing algorithms:

A: encryption aes-256 defines the encryption method for the IKE SA.

E: hash sha-256 ensures SHA-256 is used as the integrity mechanism during IKE phase 1.

According to Cisco documentation and SCAZT (Section 1: Cloud Security Architecture, Pages 19–22), these two components are essential to negotiating a secure VPN tunnel. The provided config uses group 1 (modp768), which is weak by today’s standards and could also lead to negotiation failure. However, from the available options, encryption and hash are the two required for tunnel success.