CompTIA CompTIA Security+ Exam 2026 SY0-701 Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (July 2026)

 Capacity planning is the process of determining the resources needed to meet the current and future demands of an organization. Capacity planning can help a company develop a business continuity strategy by estimating how many staff members would be required to sustain the business in the case of a disruption, such as a natural disaster, a cyberattack, or a pandemic. Capacity planning can also help a company optimize the use of its resources, reduce costs, and improve performance. References = CompTIA Security+ Study Guide with over 500 Practice Test Questions: Exam SY0-701, 9th Edition, Chapter 4, page 184. CompTIA Security+ (SY0-701) Certification Exam Objectives, Domain 4.1, page 14. Business Continuity – SY0-601 CompTIA Security+ : 4.1

Attempting to enter an unauthorized area using an access badge during a penetration test is an example of a physical test. This type of test evaluates the effectiveness of physical security controls, such as access badges, security guards, and locks, in preventing unauthorized access to restricted areas.

Defensive and offensive testing typically refer to digital or network-based penetration testing strategies.

Passive testing involves observing or monitoring but not interacting with the environment​​.

Detailed Explanation:Standard operating procedures (SOPs) outline the steps to be followed to maintain a secure baseline, such as testing and deploying patches while minimizing risk to the system. Reference: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Study Guide, Domain 4: Security Operations, Section: " Patch Management and Baseline Compliance " ​​.

The scenario shows MD5 hashed password values. The most likely reason the security administrator is focusing on these values is to protect against pass-the-hash attacks. In this type of attack, an attacker can use a captured hash to authenticate without needing to know the actual plaintext password. By managing and monitoring these hashes, the administrator can implement strategies to mitigate this type of threat.

References =

CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Course Content: Domain 04 Security Operations​.

CompTIA Security+ SY0-601 Study Guide: Chapter on Identity and Access Management​.

An external examination (also known as an external audit or external review) is the best method for the Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) to gain an understanding of how the company’s security policies compare to external regulatory requirements. External examinations are conducted by third-party entities that assess an organization’s compliance with laws, regulations, and industry standards.

Penetration tests focus on identifying vulnerabilities, not compliance.

Internal audits assess internal controls but are not impartial or focused on regulatory requirements.

Attestation is a formal declaration but does not involve the actual evaluation of compliance​​​.

A tabletop exercise is a simulated scenario that tests the organization’s incident response plan and procedures. It involves key stakeholders and decision-makers who discuss their roles and actions in response to a hypothetical incident. It can help identify gaps, weaknesses, and improvement areas in the incident response process. It can also enhance communication, coordination, and collaboration among the participants. References: CompTIA Security+ Study Guide: Exam SY0-701, 9th Edition, page 525 1

A false negative occurs when a security control or scanning tool fails to detect a vulnerability that actually exists. In vulnerability scanning, this means the scan reports a system as secure even though it is vulnerable. Therefore, a result that shows no known vulnerability is an example of a false negative if a vulnerability is present but undetected.

CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 explains that false negatives are particularly dangerous because they provide a false sense of security, potentially leaving systems exposed to exploitation. Causes of false negatives include outdated vulnerability signatures, misconfigured scanners, credentialed scan failures, or unsupported legacy systems.

Option A describes a false positive, where a vulnerability is reported but does not exist. Option B may indicate an outdated scan result, not necessarily a false negative. Option D is incorrect because zero-day vulnerabilities do not have known remediations and are typically not detected by signature-based scanners.

Thus, the correct example of a false negative is C: A result that shows no known vulnerability.

The next step should be to rescan the network. In vulnerability management, remediation is not complete simply because the operations team says fixes were applied. The security team must validate that the vulnerabilities are actually resolved. A rescan confirms whether patches, configuration changes, service removals, or compensating controls eliminated the previously identified weaknesses. Conducting an audit is broader and not the immediate technical validation step. Starting a penetration test may be useful later, but it is unnecessary before confirming that the known vulnerabilities were fixed. Submitting a report before validation could produce inaccurate closure information. Security+ expects vulnerability management to follow a cycle: identify, analyze, remediate, validate, and report. Validation is done through rescanning.

================

Web-filtering effectiveness heavily relies on content categorization to correctly identify and block access to malicious or inappropriate websites. If users are still visiting malicious links, it is likely that the categorization database or configuration needs updating or correction.

Intrusion prevention systems (A) protect against network attacks but do not filter web content by category. Encryption (C) is unrelated to web filtering, and DNS services (D) assist with domain resolution but do not directly categorize content.

Proper configuration and maintenance of content categorization are essential to effective web filtering, as emphasized in the Security Operations domain of SY0-701【6:Chapter 12†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】.

A legal hold is the correct answer because the organization is preserving potentially relevant evidence after a suspected breach involving sensitive client information. In incident response and governance, legal hold prevents deletion, alteration, or routine retention-policy destruction of data that may be required for litigation, regulatory investigation, discovery, or internal investigation. Logs, server images, and email communications are exactly the kinds of records that may become evidence. Chain of custody is related but narrower: it documents who handled evidence, when, and how integrity was maintained. Root cause analysis happens later to determine why the breach occurred. Containment focuses on stopping spread or limiting damage. Here, the key action is preservation of records.

===============

The correct answer is Compensating because a bastion host is being used as an alternative safeguard to reduce risk when a primary control cannot yet be fully implemented. In the context of the Security+ SY0-701 objectives, compensating controls are designed to provide protection when standard preventive controls are not available, effective, or feasible—such as during a zero-day exploit where no vendor patch or permanent fix exists.

A zero-day exploit represents a vulnerability that is actively being exploited before developers or vendors have released a fix. Since patching is not immediately possible, organizations must rely on compensating controls to limit exposure and reduce the likelihood or impact of exploitation. A bastion host is a hardened system placed in a network segment—often in a demilitarized zone (DMZ)—that acts as a controlled access point between untrusted and trusted networks. By routing access through this tightly secured host, the analyst reduces the attack surface and restricts direct access to internal systems that may be vulnerable to the zero-day.

Option B, Detective, is incorrect because detective controls are focused on identifying or alerting on malicious activity after it occurs, such as logging, monitoring, or intrusion detection systems. Option C, Operational, refers to processes and procedures carried out by people, such as incident response or change management, rather than a technical safeguard. Option D, Physical, applies to tangible protections like locks, cameras, or fencing, which are not relevant in this network-based scenario.

The SY0-701 study guide emphasizes the importance of layered security and adaptive risk management. When preventive controls fail or are temporarily unavailable, compensating controls like bastion hosts, network segmentation, and access restrictions allow organizations to maintain security posture and continuity of operations while longer-term solutions are developed.

Many IoT devices connect to the network via wireless access points. Reviewing these logs would reveal when the IoT device first connected, as well as any suspicious or anomalous traffic patterns associated with the exploit’s initiation.

Placing a false (decoy) text file in a sensitive location (such as /docs/salaries) is an example of a honeytoken or deception technique. This technique is used to attract insider attackers and monitor their actions when they attempt to access the file.

When layoffs occur, disgruntled employees pose a significant insider threat risk. Training supervisors to identify signs of disgruntlement and manage employees empathetically helps reduce insider threat risks by addressing issues before they escalate. Supervisors act as the first line of defense in recognizing behavioral changes and intervening.

Immediately disabling accounts (A) may cause operational issues if done prematurely; monitoring with DLP (C) is reactive and less proactive than awareness; raising awareness about social engineering (D) targets external threats more than insider risks.

This approach is part of insider threat awareness and workforce management in Security Program Management【6:Chapter 16†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】.

Port 445 is used by the SMB protocol on Windows systems. Large volumes of unexpected traffic on TCP 445 are commonly associated with worms that exploit SMB vulnerabilities (such as WannaCry or NotPetya). Worms are self-replicating malware that spread rapidly across a network, consuming bandwidth, causing high latency, and often resulting in network outages. This matches the scenario given, where network unavailability and abnormal port 445 traffic are observed.