ECCouncil Certified Cybersecurity Technician (CCT) 212-82 Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (July 2025)

Jane encountered a combination of social engineering tactics:

Spear Phishing:

CEO Impersonation Email: The initial email and the follow-up with the scanned image of the CEO's handwritten note are examples of spear phishing, where attackers target specific individuals with tailored messages to gain their trust and extract sensitive information.

Vishing:

'IT Support' Call: The phone call from the supposed 'IT support' representative asking Jane to download a 'security patch' is a form of vishing (voice phishing). This tactic involves using phone calls to trick victims into revealing sensitive information or performing actions that compromise security.

References:

Social Engineering Techniques: SANS Institute Reading Room

Phishing and Vishing Explained: Norton Security

Leaving the thermostat connected to the "Guest" Wi-Fi network, which is open to all guests, is the least effective action in protecting it from unauthorized access. Here is a detailed explanation:

Network Segmentation:

A guest Wi-Fi network is typically designed to provide internet access to visitors without granting access to the main network or its devices. However, if the guest network is open (i.e., no password), it poses significant security risks.

Risk treatment is the risk management phase that Cassius was instructed to perform in the above scenario. Risk management is a process that involves identifying, analyzing, evaluating, treating, monitoring, and reviewing risks that can affect an organization’s objectives, assets, or operations. Risk management phases can be summarized as follows: risk identification, risk analysis, risk prioritization, risk treatment, and risk monitoring . Risk identification is the risk management phase that involves identifying and documenting potential sources, causes, events, and impacts of risks. Risk analysis is the risk management phase that involves assessing and quantifying the likelihood and consequences of risks. Risk prioritization is the risk management phase that involves ranking risks based on their severity level and determining which risks need immediate attention or action. Risk treatment is the risk management phase that involves selecting and implementing appropriate controls or strategies to address risks based on their severity level . Risk treatment can include avoiding, transferring, reducing, or accepting risks. Risk monitoring is the risk management phase that involves tracking and reviewing the performance and effectiveness of risk controls or strategies over time.

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) Overview:

UEM solutions provide comprehensive management for a wide range of endpoints, including mobile devices, desktops, laptops, and even IoT devices. They integrate Mobile Device Management (MDM) and Mobile Application Management (MAM) functionalities.

Incident impact assessment is the post-incident activity performed by Cairo in this scenario. Incident impact assessment is a post-incident activity that involves determining all types of losses caused by the incident by identifying and evaluating all affected devices, networks, applications, and software. Incident impact assessment can include measuring financial losses, reputational damages, operational disruptions, legal liabilities, or regulatory penalties1. References: Incident Impact Assessment

 Quid pro quo is the social engineering technique that Johnson employed in the above scenario. Quid pro quo is a social engineering method that involves offering a service or a benefit in exchange for information or access. Quid pro quo can be used to trick victims into believing that they are receiving help or assistance from a legitimate source, while in fact they are compromising their security or privacy. In the scenario, Johnson performed quid pro quo by claiming himself to represent a technical support team from a vendor and offering to help sibertech.org with a server issue, while in fact he prompted the victim to execute unusual commands and install malicious files, which were then used to collect and pass critical information to Johnson’s machine. If you want to learn more about social engineering techniques, you can check out these resources:

[1] A guide to different types of social engineering attacks and how to prevent them: [https://www.csoonline.com/article/2124681/what-is-social-engineering.html]

[2] A video that explains how quid pro quo works and how to avoid falling for it: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Yy0gZ9xw8g]

[3] A quiz that tests your knowledge of social engineering techniques and scenarios: [https://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/story.php?title=social-engineering-quiz]

Attorney is the role played by Dany in the above scenario. Attorney is a member of a forensic team who provides legal advice on conducting the investigation and addresses legal issues involved in the forensic investigation process. Attorney can help with obtaining search warrants, preserving evidence, complying with laws and regulations, and presenting cases in court3. References: Attorney Role in Forensic Investigation

Performing a vulnerability analysis on a web application involves identifying specific security weaknesses. In this case, the WASC ID 9 refers to "Application Error Disclosure."

Vulnerability Description:

Application Error Disclosure: This vulnerability occurs when a web application reveals too much information about internal errors, potentially aiding attackers in crafting specific attacks against the system.

Detection and Mitigation:

Error Handling: Ensure that error messages do not expose sensitive information and provide only necessary details to the end-user.

Logging: Detailed error information should be logged securely for internal review without being exposed to users.

References:

OWASP Top Ten Web Application Security Risks: OWASP

WASC Threat Classification: WASC ID 9

WEP is the type of wireless encryption employed by Charlie in the above scenario. Wireless encryption is a technique that involves encoding or scrambling the data transmitted over a wireless network to prevent unauthorized access or interception. Wireless encryption can use various algorithms or protocols to encrypt and decrypt the data, such as WEP, WPA, WPA2, etc. WEP (Wired Equivalent Privacy) is a type of wireless encryption that uses the RC4 algorithm to encrypt information in the data link layer . WEP can be used to provide basic security and privacy for wireless networks, but it can also be easily cracked or compromised by various attacks . In the scenario, Charlie, a security professional in an organization, noticed unauthorized access and eavesdropping on the WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network). To thwart such attempts, Charlie employed an encryption mechanism that used the RC4 algorithm to encrypt information in the data link layer. This means that he employed WEP for this purpose. TKIP (Temporal Key Integrity Protocol) is a type of wireless encryption that uses the RC4 algorithm to encrypt information in the data link layer with dynamic keys . TKIP can be used to provide enhanced security and compatibility for wireless networks, but it can also be vulnerable to certain attacks . AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) is a type of wireless encryption that uses the Rijndael algorithm to encrypt information in the data link layer with fixed keys . AES can be used to provide strong security and performance for wireless networks, but it can also require more processing power and resources . CCMP (Counter Mode with Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication CodeProtocol) is a type of wireless encryption that uses the AES algorithm to encrypt information in the data link layer with dynamic keys . CCMP can be used to provide robust security and reliability for wireless networks, but it can also require more processing power and resources

In response to the SSRF alerts and potential breach attempts flagged by your IDS, the immediate priority is to contain the threat while maintaining the integrity of your services. Here’s a step-by-step approach:

Isolation and Containment:

Isolate Affected Servers: Disconnect the affected cloud servers from the network to prevent further unauthorized access or data exfiltration.

Redirect Traffic: Redirect incoming traffic to backup servers that are not compromised to ensure that online banking services remain available to customers.

Deep-Dive Analysis:

Cloud-Native Security Tools: Utilize cloud-native security tools provided by your cloud service provider (such as AWS GuardDuty, Azure Security Center, or Google Cloud Security Command Center) to conduct a thorough investigation of the suspicious activities.

Examine Network Logs: Analyze network logs to identify the attack vectors and understand the scope of the attack.

Coordinate with Cloud Provider:

Joint Response: Inform your cloud service provider about the incident to collaborate on identifying and mitigating the vulnerability. Cloud providers often have additional tools and expertise that can be leveraged during a security incident.

Remediation:

Patch and Harden Systems: Once the root cause is identified, apply necessary patches and harden the security posture of your cloud infrastructure to prevent similar attacks in the future.

Communication:

Internal Stakeholders: Keep internal stakeholders, including the executive team and legal department, informed about the incident and the steps being taken to address it.

References:

NIST Computer Security Incident Handling Guide:NIST SP 800-61r2

AWS Security Best Practices:AWS Documentation