Fortinet Fortinet NSE 6 - FortiEDR 7.0 Administrator NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0 Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (November 2026)

The correct answer is C.

The FortiEDR guide explains that Threat Hunting searches across endpoint activity events, including registry activity. It states that Threat Hunting can search based on attributes of files, registry keys and values, network, processes, event log, and activity event types. This fits the requirement to search for specific registry modifications across endpoints.

The guide also explains that after filtering activity events, the query can be saved and defined as a Scheduled Query. It says: “Scheduled Query: Mark this option to automate the process of detecting threats so that this query is run automatically according to the schedule that you define.” It also states that a security event is automatically created in the Incidents tab when matches are detected, and notifications can be sent through email, Syslog, and other configured methods.

The guide further states that the Repeat Every/On options define the frequency and schedule when the query runs. Therefore, a 15-minute recurring query is handled through the Scheduled Query capability in Threat Hunting, not Communication Control, policy override, or a manual Playbook trigger.

Strictly speaking, the guide calls this a scheduled query under Threat Hunting saved queries, not a “communication control rule” or “manual query.” Option C is the intended answer.

=========

The correct answer is A .

The FortiEDR 7.0.0 Administration Guide states that the FortiEDR Cloud Service (FCS) enriches and enhances system security by performing deep, thorough analysis and investigation about the classification of a security event. It determines the exact classification of security events with a high degree of accuracy.

The guide further explains that the FCS classification process is performed through data enrichment and enhanced deep analysis and investigation enabled by automated and manual processes . These processes may include intelligence services, static and dynamic file analysis, sandboxing, flow analysis through machine learning, commonality analysis, crowdsourced data deduction, and more.

Therefore, FCS does not rely only on FortiGate firewall policies, local signatures, or raw Collector log correlation. It performs enriched cloud-based automated and manual analysis to classify the incident accurately.

=========

The correct answers are B and C .

The FortiEDR 7.0.0 Administration Guide explains that IoT device discovery continuously identifies newly connected non-workstation devices, such as printers, cameras, and media devices. During discovery, each relevant Collector periodically probes nearby neighboring devices. The guide states that nearby devices usually respond by providing information about themselves, including the device/host name and IP address . This directly supports option B .

Option C is also correct because the guide states that Collectors in degraded , disabled , or isolated states do not take part in the IoT probing process. It also says FortiEDR uses the most powerful Collectors in each subnet and excludes weaker Collectors, including disabled and degraded Collectors.

Option A is wrong because the guide explicitly says Collectors running on servers do not take part in IoT probing. Option D is wrong because IoT probing is not described as deep packet inspection of all neighboring traffic; it is a discovery/probing process used to identify nearby devices and collect basic device information.

=========

The correct answer is C. The user account does not have the REST API role assigned .

The exhibit shows a Postman request to the FortiEDR Central Manager REST endpoint:

/management-rest/inventory/list-collectors

The response is 401 Unauthorized , which means the request reached the FortiEDR API endpoint but the supplied user credentials are not authorized for REST API access.

The FortiEDR 7.0.0 Administration Guide states that when adding or editing a user, the Rest API advanced option controls whether the user is allowed to access the FortiEDR Central Manager through API calls. The guide defines this option as: “Rest API — Specifies whether to allow the user to access the FortiEDR Central Manager through API calls.”

Therefore, the most accurate cause is that the account being used in Postman does not have the Rest API permission enabled.

Option A is incorrect because the request uses GET against a list endpoint, and an unsupported method would not normally be represented by this user-authentication failure. Option B is not supported by the exhibit or guide wording; the guide describes enabling REST API access per user. Option D is incorrect because first-login password reset is not the direct cause of this REST API authorization failure. The guide separately discusses password reset and password policy behavior, but that is not what the API error indicates.

The FortiEDR 7.0.0 Administration Guide states that when manually adding applications to be blocked, you can define the application using Hash or using any combination of File Name / Path / Signer attributes. This means hashes can be used independently and do not require filename, path, or signer attributes.

The guide also states that each hash is a unique identifier of an individual application, and the exhibit itself shows the hash field note: “SHA-1 or SHA-2 or MD5.” Therefore, the hash must use a supported hash format, making D correct.

For multiple hash entries, the uploaded guide text says they must be comma separated , while the exhibit note says “You can enter multiple hashes comma separated.” So the technically exact guide wording supports comma separation, not line separation. However, given your answer choices, A is clearly trying to test the requirement that multiple hashes must be separated correctly. The option wording says “line-separated,” which is not exact against the guide; the better wording would be comma-separated . Since no “comma-separated” option is provided, A is the intended separation-related answer, but the wording is flawed.

Option B is definitely wrong because hash mode is an alternative to attributes. Option C is also not the best answer because, although each hash uniquely identifies a file/application variant, the operational requirement is not that “hashes must be unique to each application” in the way the option implies. Hashes may represent different variants of the same application.

The correct answer is C .

The FortiEDR 7.0.0 Administration Guide states that for on-premises deployments, the on-premise reputation service requests missing hashes from the cloud reputation service . If a proxy is not enabled, it requests the missing hashes from the cloud reputation service through the manager nginx . If a proxy is enabled, the on-premises reputation service requests the missing hashes through the proxy.

So, when the local reputation database does not contain the requested hash, the on-premises reputation server does not ignore the request, wait for endpoint input, or automatically block the application. It queries the cloud reputation service for the missing hash reputation data.

=========

The correct answer is B. Deny the application in the Finance policy .

The FortiEDR 7.0.0 Administration Guide states that Communication Control policies define the actions to be taken for a given application or application version . It also states that each Communication Control policy applies to specific Collector Groups , and all devices that belong to those Collector Groups follow that policy. A Collector Group can be assigned to only one Communication Control policy.

In the exhibit, the Collector C8092231196 is stated to be a member of the Finance group. Therefore, to block FileZilla for that Collector, the application action must be set to Deny under the Finance policy , because that is the policy context that applies to the Collector’s group.

The guide also explains that you can modify a policy action for an application/version so that the selected application is explicitly set to Allow or Deny for the relevant policy. When modified this way, the Application/Version Details area shows the action as manually changed and excluded from the original policy action.

Option A is wrong because assigning a Simulation Communication Control Policy to the DBA group does not affect a Collector in the Finance group. Option C is wrong because assigning the Finance policy to the DBA group would affect DBA Collectors, not the Finance Collector in the scenario. Option D is wrong because assigning the Finance policy to a broader group such as Default Collector Group is unnecessary and could over-broaden the policy impact. The precise action is to deny FileZilla in the policy that applies to the Collector’s own group: Finance policy .

=========

The correct answer is A .

The exhibit shows a FortiEDR Threat Hunting saved query using RemotePort:3389, scoped to a specific device, with Scheduled Query enabled, classification set to Suspicious , and a repeat interval of 15 minutes . TCP port 3389 is the standard RDP port, so the query is designed to detect RDP-related network activity for the selected endpoint.

The FortiEDR guide states that saving a Threat Hunting query can define it as a scheduled query to automate threat detection. It further states that when a scheduled query runs and detects matches, a security event is automatically created in the Incidents tab , and notifications are sent according to the security event configuration.

Option B is too absolute and therefore wrong. The specific query shown uses a network field, but Threat Hunting itself can search activity events across files, registry, network, processes, and event logs. Option C is wrong because the Community Query checkbox is not selected, so it is not configured as a shared community/global query. The guide states that Community Query must be selected to share the query with the FortiEDR community, including other organizations.

Option D is wrong because a scheduled Threat Hunting query generates an incident; it does not automatically block RDP unless additional playbook actions are configured. The guide says scheduled queries generate security events and may trigger configured playbook actions, but the query itself is not a blocking control.

=========

The correct answers are A and C .

For Fortinet Security Fabric correlation through FortiAnalyzer or FortiAnalyzer Cloud, the FortiEDR guide states that FortiEDR can integrate with FortiAnalyzer/FortiAnalyzer Cloud “to correlate data between FortiEDR and the Fortinet Security Fabric and issue eXtended detection alerts.” To complete this, you must configure an eXtended Detection Source connector and enable eXtended Detection rules and FortiEDR Threat Hunting event collection.

The prerequisites include connectivity from the FortiEDR Central Manager to Fortinet Cloud Services (FCS) . The same prerequisite list also requires either a FortiAnalyzer administrator account with JSON API access enabled or, for FortiAnalyzer Cloud, a valid FortiCloud API user with read/write access to the FortiAnalyzer Cloud portal.

Option B is wrong because a Forensics add-on license is not listed as a requirement for this integration. Option D is badly worded and not correct. A Jumpbox with connectivity to FortiAnalyzer is required, and the guide points to FortiEDR Core setup for Jumpbox configuration, but the answer option says Core with core-only functionality , which is not the stated requirement.

=========

The correct answers are A and C .

The exhibit shows an audit/response action stating that IP address 74.125.235.20 was added to malicious IP addresses on firewall FortiGate . This matches the FortiEDR playbook action Block address on Firewall . The guide states that this action ensures connections to remote malicious addresses associated with the security event are blocked, and that a firewall connector must already be configured for this action. It also explains that a checkmark in a classification column means communication with the affected destination is automatically blocked when a security event with that classification is triggered.

Option C is the second best answer because FortiEDR events are initially classified by FortiEDR detection logic/Core, and the guide states that classifications are initially determined by the Core but can later be changed automatically by FortiEDR Cloud Service or manually. The exhibit shows “Classification Changed To: Suspicious (By Fortinet)” , but it does not say the event was manually classified by an administrator. So the event classification process is FortiEDR-driven, with later Fortinet/FCS-style automatic classification possible.

Option B is wrong. The exhibit shows one raw-data row with device cwinserv-32 +2 , which indicates more than one affected device/raw item is represented in the aggregation. So it did not occur on only one device.

Option D is wrong because the incident rows clearly show Unhandled . The guide states that security events are initially marked as unread and unhandled, and the unread/unhandled status helps users track whether anyone has read and handled the event.

=========