Fortinet Fortinet NSE 6 - Cloud Security 7.0 for AWS NSE6_WCS-7.0 Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (October 2025)

Understanding the Requirement:

The organization needs to connect a data VPC to the on-premises infrastructure with high bandwidth.

The solution should avoid multiple connections between sites.

Transit Gateway Connect:

Transit Gateway Connect is designed to integrate with SD-WAN networks and provides scalable bandwidth using GRE tunnels.

It simplifies hybrid cloud connectivity by allowing high bandwidth connections without the need for multiple physical connections.

Benefits of Transit Gateway Connect:

Supports scalable bandwidth through GRE tunnels.

Facilitates seamless integration with on-premises and cloud environments.

Reduces complexity by avoiding the need for multiple VPN connections.

Comparison with Other Options:

Option A (Transit VPC with IPSec) is not preferred due to complexity and potential limitations in bandwidth scalability.

Option B (Internet Gateway) is not suitable for private, high-bandwidth connections.

Option C (Transit Gateway multicast) does not address the requirement for high bandwidth in a hybrid cloud setup.

References:

AWS Transit Gateway Documentation: AWS Transit Gateway Connect

Hybrid Cloud Connectivity: AWS Hybrid Cloud

Invalid Credentials:

The debug output shows an "AuthFailure" error, indicating that AWS was not able to validate the provided access credentials. This usually points to incorrect or invalid AWS access or secret keys configured in the AWS Lab SDN connector (Option C).

Clock Skew:

Another common reason for authentication failures in AWS API calls is a clock skew between the FortiGate device and AWS. AWS requires that the system time of the client making the API call is synchronized with its own time, within a small margin. If there is a significant time difference, AWS will reject the credentials (Option B).

Other Options Analysis:

Option A is incorrect because the AWS API supports XML version 1.0.

Option D is incorrect as the error message does not indicate an issue with connecting on port 401.

Option E is incorrect because the error is related to authentication, not the absence of instances.

References:

AWS API Authentication: AWS API Security

FortiGate AWS Integration Guide: FortiGate AWS Integration

HA Cluster in AWS Cloud:

Deploying an active-passive HA cluster in AWS requires careful consideration of the clustering protocol used to ensure seamless failover and traffic flow.

Unicast FortiGate Clustering Protocol (FGCP):

Unicast FGCP is specifically designed for environments where multicast traffic is not feasible or supported, such as in the AWS cloud. Using unicast FGCP ensures that heartbeat and synchronization traffic between the cluster members are managed correctly over unicast communication, which is suitable for AWS's network infrastructure (Option C).

Comparison with Other Options:

Option A is incorrect because while placing both cluster members in the same availability zone might be required for certain configurations, it is not the critical factor for HA formation.

Option B is incorrect as VDOM exceptions are not directly related to the successful formation of HA.

Option D is incorrect because the ELB configuration checks are more about ensuring that the load balancer correctly routes traffic but do not specifically ensure HA formation and failover.

References:

FortiGate HA in AWS Documentation: FortiGate HA

Fortinet FGCP Details: FGCP Documentation

Network Load Balancer:

Deploying a network load balancer ensures that incoming traffic is distributed across multiple web servers, providing high availability and redundancy. This setup helps in managing traffic efficiently and maintaining service uptime even if some servers fail (Option A).

Multiple Availability Zones:

Deploying web servers in multiple availability zones (AZs) enhances fault tolerance and availability. If one AZ goes down, servers in other AZs can continue to handle the traffic, ensuring the web application remains accessible (Option D).

Other Options Analysis:

Option B is incorrect because NAT Gateways are used to provide internet access to instances in private subnets, not to make private addresses reachable from the internet.

Option C is not sufficient on its own for high availability. Adding a route to the default VPC route table forwarding traffic to the internet gateway makes the VPC internet-accessible but does not ensure high availability.

References:

AWS High Availability and Fault Tolerance: AWS High Availability

AWS Network Load Balancer: Network Load Balancer

Web Filtering:

FortiGate for AWS offers advanced web filtering capabilities, which allow organizations to control and monitor web access. This feature complements AWS's native security services by providing granular control over web traffic (Option B).

OSPF over IPSec:

FortiGate for AWS can establish dynamic routing protocols such as OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) over IPSec tunnels. This capability enhances network routing flexibility and security, which is not natively provided by AWS (Option C).

Secure SD-WAN with Application Visibility:

FortiGate for AWS provides Secure SD-WAN functionality, offering enhanced application visibility and traffic management. This is a significant addition to AWS's networking services, optimizing application performance and security (Option E).

Comparison with Other Options:

Option A (Higher VPN throughput) is not specifically enhanced by FortiGate as compared to AWS native services.

Option D (Advanced dynamic routing) is partially covered under OSPF over IPSec but is not as specific as the other chosen options.

References:

FortiGate for AWS Documentation: FortiGate on AWS

AWS Networking and Content Delivery: AWS Networking

Internet Gateway Requirement:

For an Elastic IP (EIP) to be assigned to an instance's primary ENI, the VPC must have an Internet Gateway (IGW) attached. The IGW enables the VPC to communicate with the internet, allowing the EIP to function properly (Option C).

Process of Assigning EIP:

Once the Internet Gateway is attached to the VPC, the EIP can be successfully assigned to the primary ENI of the FortiGate VM, providing it with internet access.

Other Options Analysis:

Option A is incorrect because the primary ENI is already in a public subnet.

Option B is not necessary and may not solve the issue without an attached Internet Gateway.

Option D is partially correct about the routing table but does not address the primary issue of needing an Internet Gateway.

References:

AWS Elastic IP Documentation: Elastic IP

AWS Internet Gateway: Internet Gateway

Windows Firewall Blocking Traffic:

The firewall on the Windows VM might be configured to block incoming ICMP traffic (ping requests). By default, Windows Firewall is set to block ICMP traffic, which could be a reason for the connectivity issue (Option A).

Security Group Configuration:

AWS Security Groups act as virtual firewalls for instances. If there is no rule allowing ICMP traffic in the security group attached to the Windows server, the ping requests from FortiGate will be blocked. An inbound allow ICMP rule must be added to the security group to permit this traffic (Option D).

Other Options Analysis:

Option B is incorrect because the default AWS Network Access Control List (NACL) allows all inbound and outbound traffic.

Option C is incorrect as AWS does allow ICMP traffic between subnets if properly configured with Security Groups and NACLs.

References:

AWS Security Groups: AWS Security Groups

Windows Firewall Configuration: Windows Firewall

Update Software:

As part of the AWS shared responsibility model, it is the customer’s responsibility to update and maintain the software running on the EC2 instance, including applying security patches and updates (Option A).

Configure Security Groups:

Security groups act as virtual firewalls for instances to control inbound and outbound traffic. Configuring them correctly is essential for securing the EC2 instance and ensuring only legitimate traffic can reach the server (Option C).

Manage Operating System:

Managing the operating system, including user accounts, permissions, and operating system patches, is the responsibility of the customer under the shared responsibility model (Option D).

Other Options Analysis:

Option B is incorrect as changing the existing ELB to a gateway load balancer is not necessary for securing the new EC2 instance.

Option E is incorrect because it is not required to move all web servers into the same availability zone for security purposes.

References:

AWS Shared Responsibility Model: AWS Shared Responsibility

EC2 Security Best Practices: AWS EC2 Security

Scalability:

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (CNF) is designed to scale seamlessly with your cloud infrastructure, providing the necessary protection without requiring manual intervention for scaling (Option B).

Firewall-as-a-Service:

FortiGate CNF is offered as a Firewall-as-a-Service (FWaaS), which simplifies the deployment and management of firewall capabilities directly in the cloud environment (Option D).

Management:

FortiGate CNF can be managed using FortiManager and AWS Firewall Manager, providing comprehensive management capabilities both from Fortinet's platform and AWS's native management tools (Option E).

Other Considerations:

Option A (carrier-grade protection) is not specifically highlighted as a feature of FortiGate CNF.

Option C (uses AWS Elastic Load Balancing) is incorrect as FortiGate CNF operates independently of AWS ELB, although it can integrate with various AWS services.

References:

FortiGate CNF Documentation: FortiGate CNF

AWS Firewall Manager: AWS Firewall Manager

Understanding Gateway Load Balancer (GWLB):

GWLB is designed to distribute traffic across multiple appliances for both inbound and outbound traffic, providing scalability and high availability.

Traffic Load Balancing:

GWLB can send traffic to multiple FortiGate appliances for load balancing purposes, ensuring efficient use of resources (Option A).

Stateful Processing:

For stateful processing, GWLB ensures that traffic flows (both inbound and outbound) for a given connection are directed to the same FortiGate appliance. This maintains session integrity (Option B).

Preservation and Hashing of Traffic:

Options C and D are incorrect as they suggest incorrect behavior regarding traffic content preservation and hashing for data integrity, which are not primary functions of GWLB.

References:

AWS Gateway Load Balancer Documentation: AWS Gateway Load Balancer

FortiGate Integration with GWLB: Fortinet Documentation