GitHub GitHub FoundationsExam GitHub-Foundations Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (October 2025)

Forking a gist is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist while maintaining the history of the original gist. When you fork a gist, you create a new gist in your own account that retains a link to the original, allowing you to track changes and contribute back if desired.

Forking a Gist:

Option Ais correct because forking is a straightforward way to create your own copy of another user's gist while preserving the history and making it easy to track updates.

Incorrect Options:

Option Bis incorrect because creating a new gist and copying the content would not preserve the history or link back to the original gist.

Option Cis incorrect because cloning is typically associated with repositories, not gists, and is more complex than forking for this purpose.

Option Dis incorrect because requesting to be added to the existing gist is not a standard GitHub feature.

References:

GitHub Docs: Forking Gists

=================

TheCodespaces lifecycleon GitHub includes several key steps:

Create: This is the step where a new Codespace is initiated.

Rebuild: A Codespace can be rebuilt to ensure that the environment is up-to-date with the latest code or configurations.

Delete: Once a Codespace is no longer needed, it can be deleted to free up resources.

Committing, cloning, or installing are typical Git operations but are not considered part of the specific lifecycle steps for a GitHub Codespace.

=================

GitHub is a cloud-based platform that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers tools for collaboration, project management, and security to create a safe and productive environment for developers.

GitHub Overview:

Option Bis correct because GitHub is primarily known as a cloud-based hosting service for Git repositories, offering a collaborative environment where developers can work together on projects, manage version control, and implement security practices.

Incorrect Options:

Option Ais incorrect because GitHub is not proprietary in the sense of being closed off from version control standards; it is widely recognized as an open platform for collaboration.

Option Cis incorrect because, while GitHub is accessible to new developers, it is designed for developers of all skill levels and not specifically tailored for beginners.

Option Dis incorrect because GitHub is not a centralized version control system; it supports Git, which is distributed.

References:

GitHub Docs: About GitHub

=================

In GitHub, issues and pull requests (PRs) are essential tools for managing work and collaboration in a project. Assigning individuals to these issues or PRs is a way to indicate responsibility for addressing the issue or completing the PR.

Anyone with write permissions to the repository:

Users who have write permissions to a repository can be assigned to issues and pull requests. Write permissions allow users to push changes to the repository, create branches, and modify issues and pull requests. Assigning them to an issue or PR ensures they are recognized as responsible for the task.

Anyone who has commented on the Issue or pull request:

GitHub allows you to assign issues or pull requests to users who have already engaged with the discussion by commenting on it. This feature is particularly useful for quickly assigning tasks to those who are already involved in the conversation.

Incorrect Options:

Option Ais incorrect because having an enterprise GitHub account alone does not necessarily grant the ability to be assigned to issues or PRs. Permission to assign is based on repository-specific roles and permissions.

Option Cis incorrect because not all personal GitHub accounts can be assigned to issues or PRs. The user needs either write permissions to the repository or must have commented on the issue or PR.

References:

GitHub Docs: Assigning Issues and Pull Requests

GitHub Docs: Permission Levels for a Repository

This detailed explanation provides clarity on GitHub's assignment mechanics for issues and pull requests, reflecting the platform's collaborative nature.

=================

After 30 minutes of inactivity, a GitHub Codespace willtime out. This is designed to conserve resources when the Codespace is not being actively used. The session will be paused, and you'll need to reconnect to resume your work. However, the Codespace is not deleted, and any unsaved changes might not be lost but should be committed or saved to prevent data loss.

=================

For private repositories on GitHub, the Wiki is accessible to anyone who hasRead accessto the repository. This means that if you can view the code and files in the repository, you can also view its Wiki. This makes Wikis a useful tool for documenting projects in a way that is available to all collaborators without requiring special permissions beyond those needed to access the repository itself.

=================

When creating custom issue forms on GitHub, the definition files are stored in the.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATEfolder. This directory is used to define issue templates and forms that help standardize the information collected when users open new issues in the repository. The .github folder is a special directory used for various repository configurations and workflows.

=================

In a Git repository, a file can be in one of the following three valid states:

Committed: The file is saved in the local repository. It is part of the permanent history of the project.

Modified: The file has been changed but not yet staged or committed. It is in the working directory.

Staged: The file has been marked to be included in the next commit. It is in the staging area, ready to be committed.

These states represent the typical lifecycle of a file as it moves through the process of being edited, reviewed, and saved in Git.

=================

TheCODEOWNERSfile in a GitHub repository is used to define individuals or teams that are responsible for specific parts of the codebase. When changes are made to files or directories that match the patterns specified in theCODEOWNERSfile, GitHub automatically requests reviews from the listed code owners.

Setting Reviewers Automatically:

Option Dis correct because the primary purpose of aCODEOWNERSfile is to automatically set reviewers for pull requests that affect the specified files or directories. This ensures that the appropriate team members are notified and review the changes before they are merged.

Incorrect Options:

Option Ais incorrect because theCODEOWNERSfile does not restrict who can edit specific files; it only influences who is required to review changes.

Option Bis partially related but not fully accurate because whileCODEOWNERSdoes require certain reviews, it does not mandate peer review for all code changes.

Option Cis incorrect because theCODEOWNERSfile does not define access permissions for the repository; it deals with code review processes.

References:

GitHub Docs: About CODEOWNERS

GitHub Blog: Automatically Requesting Reviews with CODEOWNERS

=================

As mentioned in the answer to Question no. 66, GitHub Actions workflows can reference actions from a variety of sources:

Any Public Repository:

Option Ais correct. Actions can be sourced from any public GitHub repository.

The Same Repository as Your Workflow File:

Option Bis correct. Actions within the same repository as the workflow file can be referenced directly.

A Published Docker Container Image on Docker Hub:

Option Eis correct. Workflows can also use actions provided as Docker container images from Docker Hub.

Incorrect Options:

Option CandDare not relevant for directly referencing actions in workflows.

References:

GitHub Docs: Reusing Workflows

=================