Huawei HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology V1.0 H12-831_V1.0 Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (September 2025)

 Network cable → Use a tester to check connectivity.

 Device version file → Check the size of the software package and check whether the file matches the device model.

 Board → Install the board on a device that is not connected to the network and observe the running status of the device.

 License → Check whether the license is in the validity period to prevent device functions from being affected.

 Migration personnel list → Check whether responsibilities and permissions are clearly assigned.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

1. Network Cable - Connectivity Testing:

Before starting a migration project, all network cables should be tested for physical connectivity issues.

Network testers can be used to detect any breaks, shorts, or incorrect wiring.

Ensuring proper connectivity avoids delays and troubleshooting issues during the migration.

2. Device Version File - Software Compatibility Check:

Firmware and software versions must be verified before upgrading or migrating network devices.

The device version file should match the model and hardware specifications to avoid compatibility issues.

If incorrect software is used, the device may not function properly or could become inoperable.

3. Board - Installation and Hardware Verification:

Before installing new hardware modules (boards, line cards, etc.) into a production environment, they should be tested in isolation.

Testing ensures the board is operational and does not introduce faults into the system.

If a board is faulty, it can cause device failure or unexpected behavior in the migration.

4. License - Validity and Activation Check:

Some network devices require licenses for full functionality (e.g., advanced routing, security features).

If a license is expired or missing, critical functions may be disabled after migration.

Checking license status in advance prevents unexpected downtime or service disruptions.

5. Migration Personnel List - Roles and Responsibilities Assignment:

Large network migrations require clear responsibility assignments for each team member.

A migration personnel list ensures that everyone knows their role, tasks, and permissions.

Proper coordination avoids miscommunication, errors, and project delays.

Key Takeaways:

✅ Network cables should be tested for connectivity.✅ Software versions should match the hardware model to prevent incompatibility.✅ Hardware boards should be tested before installing into production.✅ Licenses should be verified to prevent service disruptions.✅ Migration personnel roles should be clearly defined for smooth execution.

HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology References:

Huawei HCIP-Datacom Official Certification Guide, Chapter on Network Migration Best Practices.

Huawei Enterprise Networking Whitepapers, Guidelines on Software & Hardware Pre-checks for Migration.

Huawei Technical Documentation, License Management in Huawei Datacom Devices.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding the network connectivity:

R1 and R2 are connected through 10.0.12.0/24 and running OSPF in Area 0.

PC1 (192.168.1.11/24) is connected to R1, and PC2 (192.168.1.12/24) is connected to R2.

Analyzing each option:

Option A: "R2 cannot ping 10.0.12.1." ❌ Incorrect

R2 is directly connected to 10.0.12.1/24 (R1) on GE0/0/0, so it can ping this IP without any routing issues.

Option B: "PC1 and PC2 cannot ping each other." ✅ Correct

OSPF is only running between R1 and R2. There is no indication that R1 and R2 are redistributing connected routes (192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24) into OSPF.

As a result, R1 does not know how to reach 192.168.1.12, and R2 does not know how to reach 192.168.1.11, making communication between PC1 and PC2 impossible.

Option C: "R1 cannot ping 192.168.1.2." ❌ Incorrect

192.168.1.2 is directly connected to R2, and if R1 can reach R2 through OSPF, then R1 should be able to ping 192.168.1.2.

Option D: "R1 cannot ping 192.168.1.12." ✅ Correct

192.168.1.12 is connected to R2, but if R2 does not advertise this network to R1, R1 has no route to reach it.

Since PC1 (192.168.1.11) and PC2 (192.168.1.12) are on different subnets, and there's no redistribution, R1 cannot reach PC2's IP.

Key Takeaways and Fix Recommendations:

To allow PC1 and PC2 to communicate, R1 and R2 must advertise their directly connected networks (192.168.1.0/24) in OSPF using the network command or by redistributing connected routes into OSPF.

Command example:

makefile

CopyEdit

R1:

router ospf 1

network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

R2:

router ospf 1

network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

This would allow R1 to learn about PC2's network and R2 to learn about PC1's network, enabling communication.

HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology References:

HCIP-Datacom Official Certification Guide, Chapter on OSPF Network Design and Troubleshooting.

Huawei Datacom Training Materials, Section on OSPF Inter-Area and External Route Advertisements.

Huawei Datacom Configuration Guide, Command Reference for OSPF network advertisement and route redistribution.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding the LSA Table in the Figure

The LSA Type displayed in the LSDB of R3 is an Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA (Type 9), with the following attributes:

LS Type: Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA (Type 9)

Link State ID: 0.0.0.1

Originating Router: 10.0.2.2 (R2)

Referenced LSA Type: 0x2001 (Router-LSA, Type 1)

Referenced Link State ID: 0.0.0.0

Referenced Originating Router: 10.0.2.2 (R2)

Prefix: 2000:2::/128

Analysis of the Statement

What is an Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA (Type 9)?

Used in OSPFv3 to advertise IPv6 prefixes associated with a Router-LSA (Type 1) or Network-LSA (Type 2).

Each router generates its own Router-LSA (Type 1) and references it in an Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA (Type 9).

How does this apply to R3's LSDB?

The LSA is generated by R2 (10.0.2.2), meaning R2 originated the prefix advertisement.

The referenced LSA is a Router-LSA, indicating that the IPv6 prefix is associated with R2's router advertisement.

Since R3 sees this LSA in its LSDB, it means R2 has advertised its IPv6 prefix (2000:2::/128) into the OSPFv3 domain.

✅ Since the LSA describes an IPv6 prefix associated with R2’s Router-LSA, the statement is TRUE.

Final Conclusion:

✅ The LSA is generated by R2 and describes the IPv6 prefix associated with the Router-LSA.✅ Thus, the correct answer is: A. TRUE.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding the IS-IS Topology in the Question:

R1 (Level-1 Router) is connected to R2 (Level-1-2 Router).

R2 connects Level-1 and Level-2 areas, making it an inter-area router.

R3 (Level-2 Router) connects to R2.

The loopback addresses are:

R1: 10.0.1.1/32

R2: 10.0.2.2/32

R3: 10.0.3.3/32

Key Command Used: default-route-advertise always level-1

This command forces R1 to advertise a default route (0.0.0.0/0) to Level-1 routers.

Level-1 routers (like R1) do not have visibility into Level-2 routes unless a default route is provided by an L1-L2 router (R2 in this case).

Analyzing Each Option:

Option A (TRUE):

If R1 pings an unknown address like 10.0.4.4, it will use the default route if available. However, if no such route exists, it will not send any packets.

This behavior is expected, so this statement is true.

Option B (TRUE):

10.0.2.2 (R2) is a Level-1-2 router, and it can communicate with 10.0.3.3 (R3), which is a Level-2 router.

Since R2 and R3 are both in Level-2, they can exchange routes.

So, 10.0.2.2 can ping 10.0.3.3. This statement is true.

Option C (TRUE):

10.0.1.1 (R1) is a Level-1 router, and 10.0.2.2 (R2) is a Level-1-2 router.

Since R2 is Level-1-2, it shares Level-1 routes with R1, allowing communication between R1 (10.0.1.1) and R2 (10.0.2.2).

Therefore, this statement is true.

Option D (FALSE - Correct Answer):

10.0.1.1 (R1) is a Level-1 router, which means it only knows about Level-1 routes.

10.0.3.3 (R3) is a Level-2 router, and its route is only known by Level-2 routers (R2 & R3).

Since Level-1 routers do not learn Level-2 routes directly (unless specific redistribution is done), R1 does not have a route to 10.0.3.3.

Therefore, R1 (10.0.1.1) cannot ping R3 (10.0.3.3), making this statement false.

Conclusion:

The false statement is Option D (10.0.1.1 can ping 10.0.3.3).

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding DHCP Snooping and Trusted/Untrusted Ports

1. What is DHCP Snooping?

DHCP Snooping is a security feature that prevents rogue DHCP servers from providing unauthorized IP configurations to clients.

It categorizes switch ports into:

Trusted Ports: Allow DHCP Offer and ACK messages from a legitimate DHCP server.

Untrusted Ports: Block unauthorized DHCP responses to prevent rogue DHCP attacks.

Analyzing the Network Setup in the Figure

Interface

Connected Device

DHCP Role

Should it be Trusted?

GE0/0/1

PC1 (DHCP Client)

Requests DHCP leases

❌ Untrusted

GE0/0/2

DHCP Server (Legitimate)

Provides DHCP leases

✅ Trusted

GE0/0/3

Web Server

Not involved in DHCP

❌ Untrusted

GE0/0/4

Bogus (Rogue) DHCP Server

Malicious DHCP Server

❌ Untrusted & Blocked

GE0/0/2 is connected to the legitimate DHCP server, meaning it should be marked as a TRUSTED interface.

GE0/0/4 connects to a bogus DHCP server, which must be UNTRUSTED to block unauthorized DHCP responses.

GE0/0/1 (Client) and GE0/0/3 (Web Server) do not need to be trusted.

✅ Thus, the correct answer is: D. GE0/0/2.

Final Conclusion:

✅ GE0/0/2 should be configured as the trusted DHCP interface.❌ GE0/0/1 (Client) should remain untrusted.❌ GE0/0/3 (Web Server) does not need DHCP trust.❌ GE0/0/4 (Bogus DHCP Server) should be blocked.

Thus, the correct answer is: D. GE0/0/2.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

1. Understanding the Issue of OSPF Type 5 LSAs in a Dual-Homed CE Scenario

OSPF Type 5 LSAs (External LSAs) are used in OSPF to advertise external routes, such as those learned via BGP or redistributed from another protocol.

In a dual-homed CE setup, like the one in the figure, CE2 connects to both PE2 and PE3 using OSPF.

PE2 and PE3 both redistribute BGP routes into OSPF and advertise them to CE2.

CE2 then forwards these LSAs between PE2 and PE3, potentially causing a routing loop because each PE may re-learn its own previously advertised routes.

2. How Route Tags Prevent Loops in OSPF-BGP Redistribution

The route-tag command assigns a tag to redistributed routes.

When a router receives an external OSPF LSA (Type 5), it checks the route tag.

If the route tag matches the locally configured tag, the router ignores the route to prevent loops.

Example Configuration on PE Routers:

plaintext

CopyEdit

PE2:

router ospf 1

import-route bgp 100 route-tag 65001

PE3:

router ospf 1

import-route bgp 100 route-tag 65001

Both PE2 and PE3 tag their redistributed BGP routes with 65001.

If PE3 receives an LSA from CE2 with the tag 65001, it ignores it (because it knows it originally advertised it).

✅ This prevents OSPF from incorrectly preferring a route that was originally sourced from itself, avoiding routing loops.

3. Evaluating the Answer Choices

✅ TRUE: If the route tag of the received route matches the locally configured tag, the route is ignored, preventing loops.❌ FALSE: The statement is correct, so False is incorrect.

Thus, the correct answer is: A. TRUE

Final Conclusion:

✅ The statement is TRUE because route tagging is a valid method to prevent OSPF Type 5 LSA loops in dual-homed scenarios.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding the IS-IS Network Structure in the Question:

IS-IS Area IDs and Router Roles

Area 49.0001 (Level-1-2): Contains R1, R2, R4 (all Level-1-2 routers).

Area 49.0002 (Level-1-2 & Level-1): Contains R3 (Level-1-2) and R5 (Level-1 only).

Key Command Used: ipv6 default-route-advertise always level-1

This command forces R4 to advertise a default route (::/0) to all Level-1 routers within its area.

Only Level-1 routers in the same area as R4 will receive the default route.

Level-2 routers do not receive or propagate this default route unless additional configuration is done.

Route Distribution Analysis:

R4 (Level-1-2) is configured to advertise a default route to Level-1 routers.

R1 and R2 (both Level-1-2) are in the same area (49.0001) as R4, so they receive the default route.

R3 (Level-1-2) is in area 49.0002 but connects to R4 (49.0001), meaning it can receive the default route through its Level-1 connection.

R5 (Level-1 only) is in area 49.0002, but R4 does not propagate the default route to another Level-1 area (49.0002).

Since R5 is a Level-1 router and does not have a Level-2 connection, it cannot receive the default route from R4.

Final Conclusion:

✅ R1 receives the default route.✅ R2 receives the default route.✅ R3 receives the default route.❌ R5 does NOT receive the default route.

Thus, the correct answer is: C. R5.