IIA Business Knowledge for Internal Auditing IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (October 2025)

When a company invests in common stock, it can earn income in two primary ways:

Dividend income: When the company receives dividends, it recognizes the income.

Capital gains: When the stock is sold for a higher price than its purchase price, it results in a gain.

Why Option C (Receives dividends) is Correct:

Dividends represent income from an investment in common stock when declared and paid by the issuing company.

Under GAAP and IFRS, dividend income is recognized when received, not when declared.

Companies record dividends as investment income in their income statement.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Purchases bonds):

Incorrect because purchasing bonds is an investment transaction, not income recognition.

Option B (Receives interest):

Incorrect because interest income applies to bond investments, loans, or deposits, not common stock investments.

Option D (Sells bonds):

Incorrect because selling bonds results in capital gains or losses, not regular investment income from common stock.

IIA Practice Guide – "Auditing Investment & Treasury Activities": Discusses the recognition of investment income.

IFRS 9 (Financial Instruments) & GAAP Standards: Provide guidance on recording dividends as investment income.

COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework: Emphasizes proper financial reporting and income recognition.

IIA References:

The QAIP (Quality Assurance and Improvement Program) expresses an opinion at the internal audit function level about the overall efficiency, effectiveness, and conformance with the Standards. Engagement-level reviews assess quality for individual audits, but the overall opinion covers the full internal audit activity.

Options A and D describe perspectives within reviews but do not represent the overall opinion. Option C refers only to engagement-specific assurance, not the full function.

The described situation is a classic social engineering attack, specifically a phishing or CEO fraud (business email compromise) attempt. Social engineering exploits human psychology rather than technical vulnerabilities. In this case, the attacker attempted to impersonate the CEO and trick the board member into making an unauthorized payment.

(A) Incorrect – A risk of spyware and malware.

Spyware and malware typically involve malicious software installed on a device, which is not the case here.

This attack relied on deception rather than malware to obtain unauthorized funds.

(B) Incorrect – A risk of corporate espionage.

Corporate espionage involves unauthorized data theft, sabotage, or insider threats.

The attacker here attempted financial fraud, not intellectual property theft.

(C) Incorrect – A ransomware attack risk.

Ransomware encrypts files and demands payment for decryption.

There is no mention of system encryption or ransom demands in this case.

(D) Correct – A social engineering risk.

The attacker impersonated the CEO and used urgency to manipulate the board member into processing a fraudulent payment.

This technique is a business email compromise (BEC) scam, a well-known social engineering tactic.

IIA’s GTAG (Global Technology Audit Guide) – Cybersecurity Risks and Controls

Discusses social engineering and its impact on financial fraud.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework – Social Engineering Threats

Defines social engineering tactics, including email impersonation and phishing.

COBIT Framework – Information Security Governance

Recommends controls to mitigate social engineering risks, such as employee training and email authentication mechanisms.

Analysis of Answer Choices:IIA References and Internal Auditing Standards:

Decentralization refers to the process by which decision-making authority is distributed to lower levels of management within an organization. The degree, importance, and range of decision-making at lower levels are directly related to the extent of decentralization.

Direct Relationship Defined:

As decentralization increases, more decision-making power is transferred to lower levels of the organization.

This means that managers and employees at lower levels are empowered to make a broader range of decisions with greater significance.

The Importance of Lower-Level Decision-Making in a Decentralized Structure:

A decentralized structure allows lower-level managers to respond quickly to operational issues and make important decisions without seeking approval from top management.

This enables increased efficiency, innovation, and adaptability in a dynamic business environment.

IIA's Perspective on Governance and Decision-Making:

According to the International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF) by the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), internal auditors must assess the governance structure of an organization, which includes understanding how decision-making authority is allocated.

The IIA’s Three Lines Model highlights the role of management in decision-making, emphasizing the need for a clear and effective delegation of authority.

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance states that internal auditors must evaluate decision-making processes to ensure they align with the organization’s objectives and risk management strategies.

Supporting Business Concepts:

Decentralized organizations like multinational corporations, franchises, and divisional structures benefit from empowering lower levels with decision-making authority.

In contrast, centralized organizations retain control at the top, limiting the scope of decisions at lower levels.

A direct relationship exists because the more decentralized a company is, the greater the responsibility of lower levels in making crucial decisions.

IIA References:

IPPF Standards: Standard 2110 – Governance

IIA’s Three Lines Model – Emphasizing clear delegation of authority

COSO Internal Control Framework – Discusses decentralized decision-making in control environments

Business Knowledge for Internal Auditing (IIA Study Guide) – Governance and decision-making structure

Even if the internal audit activity is outsourced, the organization’s senior management and the board retain overall responsibility for governance, risk management, and control processes. Specifically, management must ensure that an annual risk assessment is performed to identify and prioritize organizational risks. This forms the basis of the internal audit plan.

While the external service provider may assist in planning and execution, the assessment of risks to the organization cannot be delegated away because accountability for risk management remains with the organization itself. Activities such as quality assurance programs or audit scope discussions can be supported or executed by the service provider, but responsibility for risk assessment is always with management and the board.

The internal audit plan should be risk-based. To achieve this, the CAE should develop an audit universe that lists all auditable units (processes, functions, systems, etc.) and use it as the foundation for risk assessment and prioritization.

Option B is too narrow (monetary value is just one factor). Option C is incomplete since senior management’s input is important but not the sole basis. Option D is incorrect because eliminating units not mandated by law ignores risk-based planning requirements.

Thus, the most appropriate approach is Option A: establishing an audit universe.

Understanding the Audit Concern:

The internal auditor observed a significant decline in tire production and needs to assess whether worker inefficiency is the cause.

Worker inefficiency is typically measured in terms of productivity, which relates output (number of tires produced) to input (labor hours worked).

Why Option A is Correct?

Total tire production labor hours provide a direct measure of worker efficiency. By analyzing the number of tires produced per labor hour, the auditor can determine whether efficiency has declined.

If labor hours remained constant or increased while production declined, this indicates inefficiency.

This approach aligns with IIA Standard 1220 – Due Professional Care, which requires auditors to use appropriate analysis to support findings.

Additionally, per IIA Standard 2310 – Identifying Information, auditors must obtain sufficient and relevant data to support conclusions.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option B (Total tire production costs):

Total costs include factors beyond labor efficiency, such as raw material prices, machinery maintenance, and overhead. This does not directly measure worker productivity.

Option C (Plant production employee headcount average):

Employee headcount alone does not reflect efficiency; it does not account for hours worked or individual performance.

Option D (Production machinery utilization rates):

Machinery efficiency is important but does not directly measure worker inefficiency. A decline in machine utilization could be due to maintenance, material shortages, or other non-labor factors.

Labor hours per unit of production (tires produced per labor hour) is the best metric for evaluating worker efficiency.

IIA Standards 1220 and 2310 support data-driven, relevant information gathering for audit conclusions.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 1220 – Due Professional Care

IPPF Standard 2310 – Identifying Information

Performance Standard 2320 – Analysis and Evaluation

At the end of an accounting period, certain accounts must be closed to prepare financial statements and reset balances for the next period. The accounts that must be closed are temporary accounts, which include all income statement accounts (revenues, expenses, and gains/losses).

Why Option A (Income statement accounts) is Correct:

Income statement accounts (revenues, expenses, gains, and losses) are temporary accounts that track financial performance for a specific period.

At the end of the period, these accounts are closed to the retained earnings account to reset them to zero for the next period.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option B (Balance sheet accounts):

Incorrect because balance sheet accounts (assets, liabilities, and equity) are permanent accounts that carry their balances forward to the next period.

Option C (Permanent accounts):

Incorrect because permanent accounts include all balance sheet accounts, which are never closed.

Option D (Real accounts):

Incorrect because real accounts refer to balance sheet accounts (assets, liabilities, and equity), which remain open.

IIA GTAG – "Auditing Financial Close Processes": Discusses the closing of temporary accounts at the period end.

COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework: Recommends proper financial reporting controls, including account closures.

IFRS & GAAP Accounting Standards: Define temporary and permanent accounts in financial reporting.

IIA References:Thus, the correct answer is A. Income statement accounts.

When the CAE disagrees with local management’s acceptance of a risk, the next step is to escalate the issue to higher management responsible for the risk—in this case, the bank’s chief security officer. If senior management also accepts the risk and the CAE still considers it unacceptable, the matter should then be reported to the board.

Option A (direct to the board) skips the escalation chain. Option B is ineffective if the security manager has already decided. Option C alone does not address the CAE’s responsibility to escalate unacceptable risks.

Preventive security controls proactively stop unauthorized access before it occurs. The most effective method is strict access management, where new or additional access rights require formal validation before being granted.

Prevents Unauthorized Entry – Ensures that only approved personnel have access to the power plant.

Implements Segregation of Duties (SoD) – Supervisors validate access requests, reducing insider threats.

Aligns with Least Privilege Principle – Employees get only the minimum access necessary for their role.

Prevents Security Risks Before They Happen – Unlike detective or corrective controls, this method stops unauthorized access before it occurs.

A. Offboarding procedure (monthly review) – This is a detective control, identifying issues after access is granted, not preventing them.

B. Smart lock anomaly scanning – Also detective, as it identifies suspicious behavior after access has been used.

D. Automatic notifications for after-hours entry – A corrective control, responding to potential violations instead of preventing them.

IIA’s GTAG on Identity and Access Management – Recommends pre-approval processes for sensitive locations.

ISO 27001 Annex A.9 (Access Control) – Requires role-based access management for critical infrastructures.

NIST SP 800-53 (Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems) – Defines supervisor approval as a key preventive measure.

Why Approval-Based Access Control is the Best Preventive Measure?Why Not the Other Options?IIA References:

Detecting an inventory fraud scheme requires analyzing patterns of inventory adjustments, particularly across different locations. Fraudulent activities often involve unauthorized write-offs, stock transfers, or misstatements of inventory levels.

(A) Analyze invoice payments just under individual authorization limits.

Incorrect: This technique is useful for detecting procurement fraud or invoice splitting, but not directly related to inventory fraud.

(B) Analyze stratification of inventory adjustments by warehouse location. (Correct Answer)

Fraudulent inventory write-offs often occur in specific warehouses or locations where controls are weak.

Stratifying inventory adjustments helps identify abnormal patterns, such as excessive losses in one location.

IIA Standard 2120 (Risk Management) recommends data analytics and trend analysis to detect anomalies.

COSO ERM – Control Activities emphasizes monitoring and review of inventory adjustments to prevent fraud.

(C) Analyze inventory invoice amounts and compare with approved contract amounts.

Incorrect: This technique is effective for detecting overbilling or procurement fraud, but not inventory fraud, which involves physical stock manipulation.

(D) Analyze differences discovered during duplicate payment testing.

Incorrect: Duplicate payment testing helps uncover billing fraud, not inventory fraud.

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management: Encourages fraud detection through trend analysis and data monitoring.

IIA Practice Guide – Auditing Inventory Management: Suggests stratification of inventory adjustments to identify fraud.

COSO ERM – Control Activities: Recommends monitoring inventory transactions to prevent fraud.

Analysis of Each Option:IIA References Supporting the Answer:Thus, the correct answer is (B) because analyzing stratification of inventory adjustments by warehouse location helps detect irregular patterns indicative of fraud.

Cybersecurity controls are primarily designed to protect the Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (CIA) of data. These are the three fundamental principles of cybersecurity and are essential for protecting organizational information assets. Let’s analyze each option:

Option A: Veracity, velocity, and variety.

Incorrect. These attributes are commonly associated with big data and data analytics rather than cybersecurity. Cybersecurity controls focus on ensuring that data is secure, rather than on its volume, speed, or diversity.

IIA Reference: Cybersecurity risk management frameworks emphasize the CIA triad over big data attributes. (IIA GTAG: Auditing Cybersecurity Risk)

Option B: Integrity, availability, and confidentiality.

Correct. These three principles are at the core of cybersecurity:

Confidentiality: Ensures that sensitive information is only accessible to authorized individuals.

Integrity: Protects data from unauthorized modifications or corruption.

Availability: Ensures that data and systems are accessible when needed.

IIA Reference: The IIA’s guidance on IT governance highlights the CIA triad as the foundation of cybersecurity. (IIA GTAG: Information Security Governance)

Option C: Accessibility, accuracy, and effectiveness.

Incorrect. While these attributes are important in data management and usability, they do not directly define cybersecurity controls.

Option D: Authorization, logical access, and physical access.

Incorrect. While these are essential security components, they fall under broader IT security measures rather than forming the fundamental principles of cybersecurity.

Efficiency indicators measure how well resources are used to produce outputs. The number of audits completed reflects efficiency because it shows how effectively the internal audit function utilizes available resources to deliver its plan.

Option B (observations) reflects risk exposure, not efficiency. Option C measures effectiveness (impact of audit work), not efficiency. Option D reflects investment in staff development, not operational efficiency.

Understanding Project Cost Overruns and Controls

Cost overruns occur when actual project costs exceed the budgeted or planned costs. Effective controls are required to prevent, detect, and correct deviations from the cost baseline.

The most effective way to control cost overruns is through continuous monitoring and comparison of project costs against the approved cost baseline.

Why Option D is Correct?

A formal process to monitor the project status and compare it to the cost baseline ensures that deviations are identified early and corrective actions are taken.

This aligns with the IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (IPPF), specifically:

Standard 2120 – Risk Management: Internal auditors must evaluate how organizations manage risks, including financial risks related to project cost overruns.

Standard 2500 – Monitoring Progress: Ensures that corrective actions are implemented when issues arise.

IIA Practice Advisory 2130-1: Stresses the importance of monitoring activities to mitigate financial risks.

The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) also supports cost monitoring as a key control to prevent overruns.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A: Reviewing and approving scope change requests is important, but it does not directly monitor or control cost overruns. Scope creep is a risk, but cost monitoring is a more direct control.

Option B: Having a control committee review overruns after they occur is a reactive measure. Proactive monitoring (option D) is more effective.

Option C: A quality assurance process for scope changes is valuable but does not directly prevent cost overruns. It focuses on project quality rather than financial control.

Effective internal controls for cost management emphasize real-time monitoring and comparison against the cost baseline to prevent and mitigate cost overruns.

IIA Standards 2120, 2500, and 2130-1 support proactive risk management and monitoring as essential best practices for internal auditors.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2120 – Risk Management

IPPF Standard 2500 – Monitoring Progress

IIA Practice Advisory 2130-1 – Internal Control and Risk Management

PMBOK – Cost Monitoring and Control

c

Audit observations should include condition, criteria, cause, and effect. In this case, the condition (delay risk), criteria (schedule), and effect (penalties) are already presented. What is missing is the cause—the underlying reason for the project delay. Identifying the cause ensures recommendations address the root of the problem.