IIBA Certification of Capability in Business Analysis (CCBA) CCBA Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (October 2025)

According to the BABOK® Guide, stakeholder engagement is the process of identifying and involving the people who are affected by or can influence the change initiative. Stakeholder engagement helps to ensure that the business analysis information is relevant, accurate, and complete. If the BA suspects that the elicitation activities are not delivering the quality of information required, the BA should adopt stakeholder engagement techniques to improve the participation and collaboration of the stakeholders. Some of the stakeholder engagement techniques are brainstorming, focus groups, interviews, observation, prototyping, surveys, and workshops. References: BABOK® Guide, Version 3, Chapter 4: Elicitation and Collaboration, Section 4.1: Prepare for Elicitation, Page 76; Chapter 9: Underlying Competencies, Section 9.2: Behavioural Skills, Page 336.

 According to the BABOK® Guide, elicitation is the process of drawing out, exploring, and identifying information relevant to the change. Elicitation helps the business analyst (BA) to obtain the information needed to understand the current state, define the future state, and determine the requirements for the change. If the BA needs to identify additional information after verifying the accuracy and consistency of the information obtained from the stakeholders, the BA should conduct elicitation activities to gather more information from the appropriate sources. Some of the elicitation techniques are brainstorming, document analysis, interviews, observation, prototyping, and workshops. References: BABOK® Guide, Version 3, Chapter 4: Elicitation and Collaboration, Section 4.2: Conduct Elicitation, Page 82; Chapter 10: Techniques, Section 10.9: Elicitation Techniques, Page 394.

A process model is a visual representation of the activities, events, and outcomes that describe a business process. Process models can be used to verify and validate the requirements by showing how the current and future states of the process operate and interact. A single process model on automation for all stakeholders (option A) may not capture the specific needs and concerns of each stakeholder group, and may not reflect the complexity and variability of the process. A databasestructure in the viewpoint of the selected stakeholders (option B) may not be relevant or understandable for all stakeholders, and may not address the process flow and logic. A list of requirements in a spreadsheet for all stakeholders (option C) may not provide enough detail or clarity for the stakeholders to verify and validate the requirements, and may not show the relationships and dependencies among the requirements. A set of process models in the viewpoint of the selected stakeholders (option D) is the best option, as it allows the BA to tailor the process models to the level of detail and perspective that each stakeholder group needs, and to show how the process works and changes in different scenarios and situations. References: BABOK® Guide v3, section 10.25 Process Modeling; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, section 5.3.2 Process Modeling.

 According to the BABOK® Guide, one of the tasks of the business analyst (BA) during business analysis planning and monitoring is to conduct stakeholder analysis. This involves identifying and analyzing the needs, expectations, and interests of the stakeholders who may affect or be affected by the change initiative. One of the aspects that the BA should consider when performing stakeholder analysis is the decision making authority, which is the ability of a stakeholder to approve, reject, or change a decision related to the change initiative. By missing the decision making authority of the Chief Financial Officer, the BA overlooked a key stakeholder who could impact the budget and the contracting process of the project. References: BABOK® Guide, Version 3, Chapter 2, Section 2.3; Business Analysis Expert Certification, CCBA® | IIBA®, Section “What Should I know to be CCBA Certified?”

Tracing the requirements for the interaction between a customer and the new online ordering system will enable the business analyst (BA) to illustrate the relationships between relevant requirements. According to the BABOK Guide, requirement traceability is “the ability to track theorigin and evolution of a requirement and its relationship to other requirements” 3. By tracing the requirements, the BA can show how the requirements are aligned with the business objectives, how they support each other, and how they affect the scope, quality, and risk of the solution. Showing all of the decision points in the business process, capturing all users that will be impacted by the project, and detailing the inner workings of the system being changed are possible outcomes of tracing the requirements, but they are not the primary purpose of the technique. References: 3: BABOK Guide, Version 3, Section 7.6 Trace Requirements

This is because the BA should respect the scope and objectives of the project, and consult with the owner before making any changes to the existing processes. The owner may or may not agree to incorporate the improvements, depending on the cost, benefit, and risk involved. Creating documentation based on the observed processes (B) is not a good option, as it may miss the opportunities for improvement that could enhance the quality and efficiency of the restaurant operations. Providing documentation of improved procedures © is not a valid option, as it may violate the scope and expectations of the project, and create confusion and resistance among the stakeholders. Performing benchmarking and market analysis (D) is not a relevant option, as it may be beyond the scope and budget of the project, and may not reflect the unique value proposition of the restaurant. References: CCBA Practice Test, CCBA Mock Test

The business analyst (BA) should have analyzed the completeness of the use case scenarios to avoid the situation of missing important pieces of information in the system. According to the BABOK Guide, completeness is “the degree to which a set of requirements contains all the information necessary to achieve the business objectives” 3. By analyzing the completeness of the use case scenarios, the BA can ensure that they cover all the possible paths, exceptions, preconditions, postconditions, and data elements of the system. Performing decision analysis, identifying assumptions, and preparing activity diagrams are useful techniques, but they do not directly address the issue of completeness. References: 3: BABOK Guide, Version 3, Section 8.2 Analyze Current State

Use cases and scenarios are techniques that allow the BA to model the requirements based on the user roles, functionality, and interaction with the solution. Use cases describe the goals, actions, and outcomes of the users in relation to the solution, while scenarios provide examples of how the use cases can be executed in specific situations. Use cases and scenarios help to illustrate the behavior and functionality of the solution from the user’s perspective, as well as the potential variations and exceptions.

References: The answer and explanation are consistent with the CCBA® Handbook and the IIBA® website, which provide the details and best practices for the use cases and scenarios techniques as part of the business analysis process12. The CCBA® resources also describe the types and formats of models that can be used to specify and model requirements, such as use case models and scenario models

According to the BABOK® Guide, traceability is the ability to track the life of a requirement in both a forward and backward direction. Traceability helps to manage the impact of changes, assess the quality of the solution, and ensure that the solution meets the business needs. The business analyst (BA) should plan the traceability approach for a project to ensure that the level of detail and the relationships between requirements are appropriate for the project scope, complexity, andstakeholders. The traceability approach should provide enough detail to add value without excessive overhead, such as time, cost, and effort. References: BABOK® Guide, Version 3, Chapter 3: Business Analysis Planning and Monitoring, Section 3.5: Plan Requirements Management Process, Page 42; Chapter 6: Requirements Life Cycle Management, Section 6.1: Traceability and Monitoring, Page 140.

MoSCoW prioritization is a technique that helps to classify requirements or user stories based on their relative importance and urgency. The acronym stands for Must have, Should have, Could have, and Won’t have. This technique enables the business analyst (BA) and the stakeholders to agree on the minimum viable product (MVP) and the order of delivery for the project scope. MoSCoW prioritization also supports incremental and iterative approaches, as it allows for frequent feedback and validation of the product value. References: BABOK® Guide, Version 3, Chapter 10, Section 10.46; Business Analysis Expert Certification, CCBA® | IIBA®, Section “What Should I know to be CCBA Certified?”

According to the BABOK® Guide, the governance approach is an artifact that defines the processes, roles, and responsibilities for approving, prioritizing, and managing requirements and designs. The governance approach also specifies the decision making authority, approval criteria, and change control procedures for the requirements and designs. By understanding the governance approach, the business analyst (BA) can identify the appropriate stakeholders who have the authority to approve the requirements and the approval process that needs to be followed. References: BABOK® Guide, Version 3, Chapter 2, Section 2.4.5; Business Analysis Expert Certification, CCBA® | IIBA®, Section “What Should I know to be CCBA Certified?”

Survey or QUESTION NO:naire presents a set of Questions to stakeholders and subject matter experts (SMEs), whose responses are then collected and analyzed in order to formulate knowledge about the subject matter of interest. The Questions can be submitted in written form or can be administered in person, over the telephone, or using technology that can record responses.

According to the BABOK® Guide, one of the tasks of the business analyst (BA) is to analyze current state, which involves understanding the existing situation and identifying the capabilities and elements that may be reused or require improvement. In this case, the BA has documented the components of an IT library, but has not analyzed the existing catalogues of IT services that some IT managers have. By analyzing the existing catalogues, the BA can identify the gaps, overlaps, inconsistencies, and opportunities for improvement in the current state. This will help the BA to support the project of establishing a consolidated catalogue of IT services. References: BABOK® Guide, Version 3, Chapter 5: Strategy Analysis, Section 5.1: Analyze Current State, Page 108; Chapter 10: Techniques, Section 10.3: Business Capability Analysis, Page 378.

This option directly addresses the Product Manager’s need to differentiate and review sales performance specifically for general insurance, which is essential for tracking against set targets. The other options do not specifically relate to reviewing general insurance sales or tracking performance against annual targets.

A classification schema is a technique that helps to organize and categorize requirements based on common characteristics or attributes. A classification schema can facilitate effectively understanding the different types of requirements by providing a clear and consistent way to communicate, prioritize, analyze, and manage them. A classification schema can also help to identify gaps, overlaps, and dependencies among requirements. References: BABOK® Guide, Version 3, Chapter 10: Techniques, Section 10.6: Classification Schema, Page 387; Chapter 6: Requirements Life Cycle Management, Section 6.2: Prioritize Requirements, Page 146.