ISA ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Fundamentals Specialist ISA-IEC-62443 Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (January 2026)

 Periodic audits are an essential part of the ISA/IEC 62443 cybersecurity standards, as they help to verify the effectiveness and compliance of the security program. According to the ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 standard, periodic audits should be conducted to evaluate the following aspects1:

The security policies and procedures are consistent with the security requirements and objectives of the organization

The security policies and procedures are implemented and enforced in accordance with the security program

The security policies and procedures are reviewed and updated regularly to reflect changes in the threat landscape, the IACS environment, and the business needs

The security performance indicators and metrics are measured and reported to the relevant stakeholders

The security incidents and vulnerabilities are identified, analyzed, and resolved in a timely manner

The security awareness and training programs are effective and aligned with the security roles and responsibilities of the personnel

The security audits and assessments are conducted by qualified and independent auditors

The security audit and assessment results are documented and communicated to the appropriate parties

The security audit and assessment findings and recommendations are addressed and implemented in a prioritized and systematic way Periodic audits are not only a means to meet regulations or adhere to a schedule, but also a way to validate that the security policies and procedures are performing as intended and achieving the desired security outcomes. Periodic audits also help to identify gaps and weaknesses in the security program and provide opportunities for improvement and enhancement. References: Periodic audits are an essential part of the ISA/IEC 62443 cybersecurity standards, as they help to verify the effectiveness and compliance of the security program. According to the ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 standard, periodic audits should be conducted to evaluate the following aspects1:

The security policies and procedures are consistent with the security requirements and objectives of the organization

The security policies and procedures are implemented and enforced in accordance with the security program

The security policies and procedures are reviewed and updated regularly to reflect changes in the threat landscape, the IACS environment, and the business needs

The security performance indicators and metrics are measured and reported to the relevant stakeholders

The security incidents and vulnerabilities are identified, analyzed, and resolved in a timely manner

The security awareness and training programs are effective and aligned with the security roles and responsibilities of the personnel

The security audits and assessments are conducted by qualified and independent auditors

The security audit and assessment results are documented and communicated to the appropriate parties

The security audit and assessment findings and recommendations are addressed and implemented in a prioritized and systematic way Periodic audits are not only a means to meet regulations or adhere to a schedule, but also a way to validate that the security policies and procedures are performing as intended and achieving the desired security outcomes. Periodic audits also help to identify gaps and weaknesses in the security program and provide opportunities for improvement and enhancement. References:

According to the ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 standard, a review of the CSMS should be triggered by any changes that affect the cybersecurity risk of the industrial automation and control system (IACS), such as new technical controls, organizational restructuring, or security incidents1. Budgeting is not a trigger for CSMS review, unless it impacts the cybersecurity risk level or the CSMS itself2. References: 1: ISA/IEC 62443-2-1:2010, Section 4.3.3.3 2: A Practical Approach to Adopting the IEC 62443 Standards, ISAGCA Blog3

According to ISA/IEC 62443-2-4, which defines security requirements for IACS service providers, four maturity levels (ML1–ML4) are established as evaluation criteria for measuring the maturity of cybersecurity practices.

These are:

ML1 – Initial

ML2 – Managed

ML3 – Defined

ML4 – Improving

“This standard defines four maturity levels (ML1 through ML4) to assess the extent of cybersecurity process implementation for service providers.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-2-4:2015, Clause 5.1 – Maturity Level Overview

These maturity levels are used to benchmark and certify service provider practices across different domains like patching, access control, and incident response.

A Host-based Intrusion Detection System (IDS) is a device or software application used to monitor and analyze the internals of a computing system (host) for malicious activity or policy violations. Unlike routers, switches, or even firewalls, which focus on network traffic or connectivity, a host-based IDS operates on individual machines to detect unauthorized activity or changes.

Maintenance service activities typically begin after the system is deployed and handed over to the asset owner. This is aligned with the Operation and Maintenance phase of the IACS lifecycle.

“Maintenance service providers typically become responsible for cybersecurity-related activities after the asset owner takes ownership of the system, following handover.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-2-4:2015, Clause 4.2.3 – Transition and Handover

Prior to handover, integrators and product suppliers manage the system. Maintenance providers take over only post-commissioning.

ISA/IEC 62443 distinguishes between voluntary standards and legally binding obligations. Understanding this distinction is essential for compliance planning.

Step 1: Definition of regulations

Regulations are rules issued by governments or authorized regulators that carry legal force. Non-compliance can result in penalties, fines, or legal action.

Step 2: Standards vs regulations

ISA/IEC 62443 itself is a voluntary international standard unless incorporated into law or contracts. Frameworks and special publications provide guidance but lack inherent legal enforceability.

Step 3: ISA/IEC 62443 context

The standard acknowledges that asset owners must comply with applicable regulations first, then apply standards like 62443 to meet cybersecurity objectives.

Step 4: Correct terminology

Only regulations meet the definition of legally enforceable rules.

Therefore, the correct answer is Regulations.

The ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 standard introduces Security Program Maturity Levels, which help assess how well an organization has integrated security into its industrial operations. Level 1 is the "Initial" stage where processes are ad-hoc, undocumented, and vary across the organization — precisely the case described in the question.

“Maturity Level 1 (Initial) — Processes are ad hoc and undocumented. There is no consistency in how security is implemented across the organization or teams. Security activities are performed inconsistently, typically in response to incidents.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-2-1:2010, Table 4 – Maturity Levels

The inconsistency between shifts and teams indicates a lack of standardized procedures, which is a hallmark of Level 1.

Foundational Requirement 1 (FR 1) in the ISA/IEC 62443 series is titled “Identification and Authentication Control (IAC)”. Its purpose is to control access to selected devices by ensuring that only authenticated and authorized users or systems can interact with critical IACS components.

“FR 1 – Identification and Authentication Control (IAC): This foundational requirement ensures that all users and components interacting with the system are uniquely identified and authenticated before access is granted.”

— ISA/IEC 62443-3-3:2013, Clause 4.2.1 – FR 1

This foundational layer supports higher-level security goals like use control, confidentiality, and system integrity.

ISA/IEC 62443-4-2 defines technical security requirements for IACS components, focusing on how products must be designed to resist cyber threats.

Step 1: Definition of components

The standard explicitly includes embedded devices (such as PLCs, RTUs, sensors, and controllers) and software applications (such as HMIs, control software, and engineering tools).

Step 2: Component-level scope

4-2 applies foundational requirements such as identification and authentication, integrity, confidentiality, and availability directly to components, regardless of whether they are hardware or software.

Step 3: Why other options are incomplete

Limiting the scope to only network devices, only devices, or only software ignores the integrated nature of IACS components.

Step 4: Supplier responsibility

These requirements support secure-by-design principles for product suppliers.

Therefore, the correct answer is Embedded devices and software applications.

ISA/IEC 62443 frequently references common industrial protocols when discussing network security, segmentation, and secure communications. MODBUS TCP/IP is one of the most widely deployed industrial protocols and is explicitly recognized as operating over TCP port 502.

Step 1: Protocol context

MODBUS TCP/IP is the Ethernet-based adaptation of the MODBUS protocol, enabling communication between PLCs, HMIs, and SCADA systems over IP networks. Unlike HTTP or HTTPS, MODBUS does not include native authentication or encryption.

Step 2: Port assignment

The standard TCP port assigned to MODBUS TCP/IP is 502, which is well known and commonly targeted by attackers. ISA/IEC 62443 highlights that well-known ports increase exposure and therefore require compensating controls such as firewalls, segmentation, and deep packet inspection.

Step 3: Security implications

Because port 502 traffic can carry control commands directly affecting physical processes, the standard emphasizes controlling and monitoring communications using this port within defined zones and conduits.

Step 4: Why other options are incorrect

Port 21 is used for FTP

Port 80 for HTTP

Port 443 for HTTPS

Thus, the correct and standards-aligned answer is 502.