Oracle Oracle AI Vector Search Professional 1z0-184-25 Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (September 2025)

In Oracle Database 23ai, DBMS_VECTOR_CHAIN.UTL_TO_TEXT is the PL/SQL function that converts documents in formats like PDF, DOC, JSON, XML, or HTML into plain text, a key step in preparing data for vectorization in RAG workflows. DBMS_VECTOR.TEXT_TO_PLAIN (A) is not a valid function. DBMS_VECTOR_CHAIN.UTL_TO_CHUNKS (C) splits text into smaller segments, not converts documents. DBMS_VECTOR.CONVERT_TO_TEXT (D) does not exist in the documented packages. UTL_TO_TEXT is part of the DBMS_VECTOR_CHAIN package, designed for vector processing pipelines, and is explicitly noted for document conversion in Oracle’s documentation.

To integrate OCI Generative AI with Autonomous Database in Oracle 23ai (e.g., for Select AI), an AI profile (A) is created within the database using DBMS_AI. This profile configures the connection to OCI Generative AI, specifying the LLM and authentication (e.g., Resource Principals). A compartment (B) organizes OCI resources but isn’t “created” specifically for this integration; it’s a prerequisite. A new user account (C) or VPN tunnel (D) isn’t required; security leverages existing mechanisms. Oracle’s Select AI setup documentation highlights the AI profile as the key facilitator.

Using local ONNX (Open Neural Network Exchange) models for embedding within Oracle Database 23ai means loading pre-trained models (e.g., via DBMS_VECTOR) into the database to generate vectors internally, rather than relying on external APIs or services. The primary significance is enhanced security (D): sensitive data (e.g., proprietary documents) never leaves the database, avoiding exposure to external networks or third-party providers. This aligns with enterprise needs for data privacy and compliance (e.g., GDPR), as the embedding process—say, converting "confidential report" to a vector—occurs within Oracle’s secure environment, leveraging its encryption and access controls.

Option A (SQLPlus support) is irrelevant; ONNX integration is about AI functionality, not legacy client compatibility—SQLPlus can query vectors regardless. Option B (improved accuracy) is misleading; accuracy depends on the model’s training, not its location—local vs. external models could be identical (e.g., same BERT variant). Option C (reduced dimensions) is a misconception; dimensionality is model-defined (e.g., 768 for BERT), not altered by locality—processing speed might improve due to reduced latency, but that’s secondary. Security is the standout benefit, as Oracle’s documentation emphasizes in-database processing to minimize data egress risks, a critical consideration for RAG or Select AI workflows where private data fuels LLMs. Without this, external calls could leak context, undermining trust in AI applications.

In Oracle Database 23ai, a VECTOR column can be defined with a specific size (e.g., VECTOR(512, FLOAT32)) or left unspecified (e.g., VECTOR). Not defining a size (D) provides flexibility during development because different embedding models (e.g., BERT, SentenceTransformer) generate vectors with varying dimensions (e.g., 768, 384) and data types (e.g., FLOAT32, INT8). This avoids locking the schema into one model, allowing experimentation. Accuracy (A) isn’t directly impacted by size definition; it depends on the model and metric. A fixed size doesn’t restrict the database to one model (B) but requires matching dimensions. Text length (C) affects tokenization, not vector dimensions. Oracle’s documentation supports undefined VECTOR columns for flexibility in AI workflows.

The VECTOR_DIMENSION_COUNT() function in Oracle 23ai returns the number of dimensions in a VECTOR-type value (e.g., 512 for VECTOR(512, FLOAT32)). It’s a metadata utility, not a validator of content or structure beyond type compatibility. Option B—using a vector with an unsupported data type—causes an error because the function expects a VECTOR argument; passing, say, a VARCHAR2 or NUMBER instead (e.g., '1,2,3' or 42) triggers an ORA-error (e.g., ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes). Oracle enforces strict typing for vector functions.

Option A (exceeding specified dimensions) is a red herring; the function reports the actual dimension count of the vector, not the column’s defined limit—e.g., VECTOR_DIMENSION_COUNT(TO_VECTOR('[1,2,3]')) returns 3, even if the column is VECTOR(2), as the error occurs at insertion, not here. Option C (duplicate values, like [1,1,2]) is valid; the function counts dimensions (3), ignoring content. Option D (using TO_VECTOR()) is explicitly supported; VECTOR_DIMENSION_COUNT(TO_VECTOR('[1.2, 3.4]')) returns 2 without issue. Misinterpreting this could lead developers to over-constrain data prematurely—B’s type mismatch is the clear error case, rooted in Oracle’s vector type system.

To add a new column to an existing table, Oracle uses the ALTER TABLE statement with the ADD clause. Option B, ALTER TABLE my_table ADD (v VECTOR(4, FLOAT32)), correctly specifies the column name "v", the VECTOR type, and its attributes (4 dimensions, FLOAT32 precision) within parentheses, aligning with Oracle’s DDL syntax for VECTOR columns. Option A uses MODIFY, which alters existing columns, not adds new ones, making it incorrect here. Option C uses UPDATE, a DML statement for updating data, not a DDL operation for schema changes. Option D omits parentheses around the VECTOR specification, which is syntactically invalid as Oracle requires dimensions and format to be enclosed. The SQL Language Reference confirms this syntax for adding VECTOR columns.

Fetching the top-3 matching sentences requires a similarity search, and balancing speed and accuracy points to approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) techniques. Option A—approximate similarity search with VECTOR_DISTANCE—uses an index (e.g., HNSW, IVF) to quickly find near-matches, ordered by distance (e.g., SELECT sentence, VECTOR_DISTANCE(vector, :query_vector, COSINE) AS score FROM books ORDER BY score FETCH APPROXIMATE 3 ROWS ONLY). The APPROXIMATE clause leverages indexing for speed, with tunable accuracy (e.g., TARGET_ACCURACY), ideal for large datasets where exactness is traded for performance.

Option B (exact search with Euclidean) scans all vectors without indexing, ensuring 100% accuracy but sacrificing speed—impractical for big datasets. Option C (“multivector” search) isn’t a standard Oracle 23ai construct; it might imply multiple vectors per row, but lacks clarity and isn’t optimal here. Option D (relational filters plus similarity) adds WHERE clauses (e.g., WHERE genre = 'fiction'), useful for scoping but not specified as needed, and doesn’t inherently balance speed-accuracy without ANN. Oracle’s ANN support in 23ai, via HNSW or IVF withVECTOR_DISTANCE, makes A the practical choice, aligning with real-world RAG use cases where response time matters as much as relevance.

Oracle GoldenGate 23ai is a real-time data replication and integration tool, extended in 23ai to handle the VECTOR data type for AI applications. Its key advantage (A) is enabling real-time updates of vector data across distributed locations—e.g., replicating VECTOR columns from a primary database in New York to a secondary in London with sub-second latency. This ensures AI models (e.g., for similarity search or RAG) access the latest embeddings as source data (e.g., documents) changes, critical for dynamic environments like customer support systems where new queries demand current context. Imagine a VECTOR column storing embeddings of support tickets; GoldenGate keeps these synchronized across regions, minimizing staleness that could degrade AI responses.

Option B (automatic translation) is fictional; GoldenGate doesn’t convert vector formats (e.g., FLOAT32 to INT8)—that’s a model or application task. Option C (compression) isn’t a GoldenGate feature; compression might occur at the storage layer, but GoldenGate focuses on replication fidelity, not size reduction. Option D (version control) misaligns with GoldenGate’s purpose; it ensures data consistency, not historical versioning like Git. Real-time replication (A) stands out, as Oracle’s documentation emphasizes GoldenGate’s role in keeping vector-driven AI applications globally consistent, a game-changer for distributed AI deployments where latency or inconsistency could disrupt user trust. Without this, static exports (e.g., Data Pump) would lag, undermining real-time AI use cases.