PECB PECB Certified ISO 45001 Lead Auditor Exam ISO-45001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (October 2025)

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation along with All ISO 45001 Audit References

Clause 8.1.2 of ISO 45001 pertains to Eliminating Hazards and Reducing OH&S Risks. Organizations must implement appropriate controls to manage workplace hazards effectively.

Issue Identified:The kitchen environment at the audited site presents multiple hazards, including:

Oil spillage creating a slip hazard.

Open drums of waste material posing a chemical or hygiene hazard.

Unsecured knives and cleavers increasing the risk of cuts.

Boiling water left unattended, posing a risk of burns.

Lack of visible fire extinguishers or fire blankets, increasing fire risk.

Analysis of Options:

A. Failure to reduce risks associated with working in the kitchen.This option accurately captures the broader failure to implement effective measures to eliminate or reduce hazards across multiple areas in the kitchen.

B. Measures to prevent slippage in the kitchen from waste cooking oil were not taken.This is specific to one hazard (oil spillage) and does not address other significant risks observed, such as fire safety or sharp tools.

C. Staff are at risk of serious injury while working in the kitchen.While true, this is more of a general observation and does not address the root cause of the hazards or the failure of controls.

D. Training of the kitchen staff was not effective enough to prevent poor safety awareness in the kitchen area.Although training deficiencies may contribute to the issue, this option does not reflect the overarching systemic failure to manage hazards effectively.

Best Description of the Nonconformance:Failure to reduce risks associated with working in the kitchen (Option A) is the most comprehensive finding, reflecting the organization’s lack of adequate controls to mitigate hazards.

ISO References:

Clause 8.1.2: Organizations must establish controls to eliminate or minimize OH&S risks systematically.

Clause 7.2: Ensuring competency through training is important but must be coupled with hazard control measures.

Clause 0.2 of ISO 45001 emphasizes the involvement of top management and alignment of OH&S objectives with the organization’s OH&S policy.

Nonconformities Identified:

The objectives were developed by an external consultant without involving top management, which undermines leadership accountability and commitment.

The objectives were based on a competitor’s framework, not aligned with the organization’s unique OH&S policy or context.

Analysis of Options:

A. Establishing OH&S objectives did not include top management.True. Clause 5.1 (Leadership) and Clause 6.2 (Objectives) emphasize that top management must be involved in defining and supporting OH&S objectives.

B. OH&S objectives are not being implemented by personnel.Implementation relates to operationalization, not the development phase, and is not relevant to Clause 0.2.

C. OH&S objectives are not maintained as documented information.While documentation is required, the absence of documented information is a separate issue under Clause 7.5, not Clause 0.2.

D. OH&S objectives were not established in alignment with the organization’s OH&S policy.True. Clause 6.2.1 requires objectives to align with the OH&S policy, which reflects the organization’s commitment to safety and health.

E. The consultant has not interpreted ISO 45001 correctly.While possibly true, the issue here is the organization’s failure to involve top management, not the consultant’s interpretation.

F. The organization cannot afford to undertake OH&S objectives all at once.Financial constraints are not relevant to Clause 0.2; objectives can be prioritized for phased implementation.

ISO References:

Clause 0.2: Leadership commitment and alignment with organizational policy.

Clause 5.1: Top management’s role in leadership and participation.

Clause 6.2.1: Establishing OH&S objectives aligned with the policy.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation along with All ISO 45001 Audit References

Activities following the closure of a third-party audit are generally related to improving the audit process and addressing any unresolved issues.

Analysis of Options:

A. Addressing any audit complaints:Correct. Post-audit, complaints or concerns from stakeholders are addressed to improve the audit process and maintain credibility.

B. Conducting a closing meeting:Incorrect. The closing meeting occurs before the audit is closed.

C. Conducting a review of opportunities for improvement:Correct. Reviewing opportunities for improvement post-audit helps in refining processes and aligning them with organizational goals.

D. Revising the audit's objectives:Incorrect. Audit objectives are established during the planning phase, not after the audit has been closed.

E. Updating risks and opportunities to the audit programme:Incorrect. Updates to risks and opportunities occur during ongoing audits, not specifically post-audit.

F. Writing the audit report:Incorrect. The audit report is prepared before the audit is officially closed.

ISO References:

Clause 9.2.2: Audit process review.

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.7: Managing complaints and follow-up.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation along with All ISO 45001 Audit References

An audit trail for evaluating compliance with regulations should focus on the identification, communication, and monitoring of legal and other requirements. Clause 9.1.2 of ISO 45001:2018 requires organizations to evaluate compliance with applicable OH&S legal and other requirements.

Analysis of Options:

A. What is the cost of repairing the wall?Irrelevant to compliance evaluation, as cost considerations are not part of legal compliance.

B. What hazards have been identified as being associated with regulations?Correct. Identifying hazards is a critical step in understanding compliance obligations (Clause 6.1.2).

C. How are maintenance staff made aware of regulatory requirements?Correct. Communication and training are vital for compliance (Clause 7.3).

D. How are OH&S objectives verified?Not directly relevant to compliance evaluations, as objectives pertain to performance improvement.

E. How are OHSMS records of compliance evaluations controlled and managed?Correct. Proper documentation and record-keeping are essential for demonstrating compliance (Clause 7.5).

F. How are updates to OH&S regulations monitored?Correct. Monitoring regulatory changes is critical for maintaining compliance (Clause 6.1.3).

G. How is the cost of safety improvements calculated?Irrelevant to compliance, as cost analysis is not required by ISO 45001.

H. What are the qualifications of the OHS Manager and Maintenance Manager?While competence is important, this does not directly relate to compliance evaluations.

I. What input does the Maintenance Manager have in the determination of legal compliance?Correct. Understanding the roles and responsibilities of key personnel ensures effective compliance (Clause 5.3).

J. What knowledge does the OHS Manager have in relevant safety legislation?Correct. Awareness of applicable legislation is critical for effective compliance evaluation (Clause 7.2).

ISO References:

Clause 9.1.2: Evaluation of compliance.

Clause 6.1.2: Hazard identification and risk assessment.

Clause 7.5: Documented information.

Clause 10.2 of ISO 45001 requires organizations to investigate incidents, determine root causes, and implement corrective actions to prevent recurrence.

Analysis of Options:

A. Check whether corrective actions were taken.This directly relates to the requirement to implement corrective actions to address the identified risks and hazards. Failure to do so would indicate nonconformity.

B. Determine whether the Health and Safety Authority was notified.Notification is a legal requirement in certain jurisdictions, but it is not explicitly required under ISO 45001 unless the legal context demands it.

C. Establish whether the root cause was determined.Root cause analysis is fundamental for effective corrective action. Without this, corrective measures may not address the underlying problem.

D. Find out when the operator's machine was last subject to maintenance.While maintenance is important, it does not directly address the incident's nonconformity.

E. Find out whether the operator was sent to the hospital.Sending the operator to the hospital is a reactive step and not relevant to compliance with Clause 10.2.

F. Interview the operator about PPE usage.This is relevant but insufficient for determining compliance with Clause 10.2.

ISO References:

Clause 10.2: Investigation of incidents, determination of causes, and implementation of corrective actions.

Clause 8.1.2: Hierarchy of controls and risk reduction.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation along with All ISO 45001 Audit References

Clause 9.3 of ISO 45001:2018 defines inputs for management review, which must include information on performance trends, feedback, risks, and opportunities for improvement.

Analysis of Options:

A. Allocation of a bigger budget for the OHS department:This is an output of management review, not an input.

B. Decisions on improvements in the OHSMS:This is an output, not an input.

C. Decisions related to continual improvement opportunities:This is an output, not an input.

D. Procurement of new safety harnesses for workers:This is an operational action, not an input for management review.

E. Proposal to prioritize health and safety issues as a business strategy:Proposals may be discussed during review, but they are outputs.

F. Report showing the trend of an increase in safety incidents:Correct. This is a valid input that informs system performance.

G. Updates to the risk register:Correct. Risk updates are required inputs under Clause 6.1.2.

H. Worker feedback of positive and negative comments:Correct. Feedback is an essential input per Clause 5.4 and Clause 9.3.

ISO References:

Clause 9.3: Management review inputs.

Clause 5.4: Worker consultation and participation.

Audit reports should focus on objective evidence, observations, and findings relevant to the management system and the audit process. Personal opinions, unrelated remarks, or derogatory comments are inappropriate.

Analysis of Statements:

A. The guide was trying to be helpful and would not stop talking during the audit:Incorrect. This is irrelevant to the audit findings or conclusions.

B. The Sales Manager was kind and seems to be a nice person:Incorrect. Personal opinions about individuals are not appropriate in audit reports.

C. The audit client’s objectives for this audit were never realistic. That’s why we were unable to complete the audit plan:Correct. This is relevant as it relates to the audit process and highlights challenges in meeting objectives.

D. The maintenance team could not replace a lightbulb, let alone an air conditioning unit:Incorrect. This is derogatory and irrelevant to the audit report.

E. The OHS Management team were extremely helpful and went out of their way to facilitate access to required records:Correct. This is a valid observation about cooperation during the audit process.

F. The OHS Manager disagreed with me in respect of all of the nonconformances I raised. He still does not accept any of them:Incorrect. While disagreements may occur, this statement is overly subjective and not constructive.

G. The Production Manager is lucky to have a job as he does not appear to understand how anything works around here:Incorrect. Personal attacks or irrelevant judgments have no place in the report.

H. The Sales Manager said he had forgotten the password to the Sales Ordering system and so too had everyone else in his department:Correct. This relates to system access and could indicate a nonconformance or an opportunity for improvement.

ISO References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.7: Reporting audit results.