PMI Project Management Professional (2025 Version) PMP Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (July 2025)

 A stakeholder engagement plan (SEP) documents how involved and influential your project stakeholders are. It also outlines your stakeholder communication plan, including when you’ll reach out to each stakeholder, what platform you’ll use, and how much information you’ll deliver1. The project manager should assess the information requirements of the community to ensure effective communication and engagement. This involves understanding what information the community needs, how they prefer to receive it, and how often they need updates. This approach helps to build trust, manage expectations, and foster a positive relationship with the community, which can contribute to the success of the project1. References: Asana Resources | Project management | 5 steps to creating a stakeholder engagement plan

The project manager should choose a hybrid approach for this project, as this is a combination of predictive and adaptive (or agile) approaches that can be tailored to suit the project’s characteristics and requirements. A hybrid approach allows the project manager to apply different methods and practices to different phases or deliverables of the project, depending on the level of uncertainty, complexity, and change involved. For example, the project manager can use a predictive approach for the research part of the project, where the scope, schedule, and cost are well-defined and stable, and an agile approach for the delivery part of the project, where the scope, schedule, and cost are flexible and iterative, and the customer feedback is incorporated frequently. The other options are not the best choices for this project, as they do not reflect the diversity and variability of the project’s nature and context. References:

[PMBOK Guide], 7th edition, pages 14-15, 18-19, 22-23.

[Agile Practice Guide], pages 8-9, 12-13, 16-17.

The project manager should first meet with the sales and marketing teams to identify the requirements that were collected during the interview sessions with potential customers. This is because the project manager needs to understand the customer needs and expectations before proceeding with the design phase. The project manager can then use the requirements as the basis for developing the test cases and acceptance criteria for the equipment. Meeting with the sales and marketing teams is also consistent with the agile and hybrid methodologies, which emphasize customer collaboration and feedback. References:

PMP Examination Content Outline, page 8, task 1 under People domain: “Manage conflict among project stakeholders by analyzing the source and level of conflict and applying appropriate conflict resolution techniques.”

PMBOK Guide, page 141, section 5.2 Collect Requirements: “Collect Requirements is the process of determining, documenting, and managing stakeholder needs and requirements to meet project objectives.”

PMI-PBA Examination Content Outline, page 9, task 1 under Needs Assessment domain: “Assess proposed solutions to determine which solution best fits the business need, identify gaps and shortcomings in solutions, and determine necessary workarounds or changes to the solution.”

[Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide], page 31, section 3.2.1 Elicitation Techniques: “Interviews are one of the most commonly used elicitation techniques. Interviews are used to obtain information on the current state, the desired future state, and any recognized gaps between the two states from the perspective of the interviewee.”

According to the PMBOK® Guide, a project manager should be able to lead and support the team in adapting to the changing environment and emerging opportunities. This includes providing coaching and mentoring to the team members, especially when they are transitioning from a predictive to an agile approach. The project manager should also facilitate team training and development, and foster a positive team culture that embraces agility and collaboration. Creating an agile conduct guideline or providing directions to the team members may not be sufficient or effective in addressing the knowledge gaps and changing the culture. Replacing the key team members with new resources may be disruptive and costly, and may not guarantee the success of the transformation. References: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, pages 52-53, 334-335.

 According to the PBA Guide, one of the key activities of the project manager is to ensure that all project information is captured, stored, and shared appropriately throughout the project life cycle1. This includes creating and maintaining a project repository or a document management system that can store all project deliverables, such as test reports, in a secure and accessible way2. By doing so, the project manager can prevent the loss of valuable information and facilitate knowledge transfer among the project team and stakeholders. The other options are not relevant or effective for this issue, as they do not address the root cause of the missing test reports. References:

1: PBA Guide, Chapter 3, Section 3.3.1, Page 63

2: PBA Guide, Chapter 3, Section 3.3.2, Page 64

The agile project lead should have assessed the technical and organizational readiness for the project and identified risks at the beginning of the first iteration. This would have helped to ensure that the project scope, requirements, and deliverables were feasible, realistic, and aligned with the product vision and customer expectations. It would have also enabled the agile project lead to anticipate and mitigate any potential technical or organizational impediments that could affect the project execution and delivery. By performing this assessment and risk identification early in the project, the agile project lead could have avoided the situation where a team member discovered a technical gap midway through implementation that required rework and communication to all stakeholders. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 18; Agile Practice Guide, 2017, page 14; PMP Exam Content Outline, 2021, page 12.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager is responsible for ensuring that the project delivers the expected business value and benefits. If the project manager acquires information that indicates a significant reduction in the business value of the project, they should communicate this information to the project sponsor and other key stakeholders, and recommend a reassessment of the project business case and viability. The project sponsor is the ultimate authority to decide whether to continue, cancel, or change the project based on the updated information and analysis. Removing items from the backlog, continuing with the defined scope, or canceling the project without consulting the sponsor are not appropriate actions for the project manager to take in this situation. References: = PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 23; PMI, Project Management Professional (PMP) Examination Content Outline, 2021, page 6.

The project manager should address the personal differences and work styles of the team members by meeting with them and agreeing on expectations from each other. This is a proactive way of managing conflict and fostering collaboration among the team members. It also helps to establish a common vision and goals for the project and clarify the roles and responsibilities of each team member. This approach is consistent with the PMI-PBA Domain 5: Solution Evaluation, Task 5.2: Communicate Solution Status, and the PMP Domain 3: People, Task 3.4: Lead a Team. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMI-PBA Exam Content Outline, Domain 5: Solution Evaluation, Task 5.2: Communicate Solution Status1

PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain 3: People, Task 3.4: Lead a Team2

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 9: Project Resource Management, Section 9.4: Develop Team

minimum viable product (MVP) is a version of a product that has enough features to satisfy early customers and provide feedback for future development1. The project manager should use an MVP to validate the customer requirements and test the assumptions and hypotheses about the product value and feasibility2. An MVP can help the project manager to learn from the customer feedback and make adjustments to the product scope and design3. Creating product documentation, a survey, or a prototype with all features are not as effective as an MVP in validating the customer requirements and obtaining feedback. References:

1: PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Project Management Institute Inc., 2021, p. 177.

2: PMI, The Standard for Project Management – Seventh Edition, Project Management Institute Inc., 2021, p. 63.

3: PMI, Agile Practice Guide, Project Management Institute Inc., 2017, p. 36.

When a new risk is identified and communicated directly to management, the project manager should first discuss with the consultant to understand why the risk was escalated. This will help the project manager to understand the severity of the risk and why it was not brought to the attention of the team first. Based on this understanding, the project manager can then decide the next steps, which could include including the risk in the risk assessment, entering it into the risk register, or escalating it further. References: PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Section 11.1: Plan Risk Management, and Section 11.5: Plan Risk Responses.

The best way to resolve any stakeholder issues is to communicate with them directly and openly. Setting up a meeting with the stakeholder will allow the project manager to understand their expectations, needs, and concerns, and to negotiate a mutually acceptable solution. Moving to a predictive approach, talking to the team separately, or scheduling a team retrospective will not address the root cause of the problem, which is the stakeholder’s dissatisfaction with the product concept. Moreover, these options may create more confusion, conflict, or delay in the project. References:

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 518: “The project manager should proactively and regularly engage with stakeholders to understand their needs and expectations, address issues as they occur, manage conflicting interests, and foster appropriate stakeholder engagement in project decisions and activities.”

PMI-PBA® Guide, 1st edition, page 35: “The business analyst should communicate with stakeholders to elicit, analyze, and validate their needs and expectations, and to facilitate collaboration and consensus-building.”

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.3.3.1, procurement agreements are legal documents that define the contractual relationship between the buyer and the seller. They include terms and conditions, scope of work, pricing, payment schedule, delivery dates, and other clauses that govern the procurement process. If the vendor is unable to deliver some of the equipment at the agreed dates, the project manager should review the procurement agreements to determine the impact of the delay on the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, and risk. The project manager should also communicate with the vendor to understand the root cause of the delay and negotiate possible solutions or alternatives. Depending on the severity of the delay and the clauses in the procurement agreements, the project manager may also invoke penalties, incentives, or termination options to protect the interests of the project. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.3.3.1; PMI website

Graphical user interface, application Description automatically generated

The graph shows that the project is performing below the baseline for both schedule and cost, which means it is behind schedule and under budget. This indicates that the project is not meeting its planned progress and deliverables, and may have some issues with scope, quality, or resources. The project manager should review the project schedule to identify the root causes of the delays, and take corrective actions to bring the project back on track. The project manager should also monitor the project cost to ensure that it does not exceed the budget, and communicate the status and changes to the stakeholders. References:

PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Chapter 8: Performance Measurement and Reporting1

The PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 5: Planning Business Analysis Work2

Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Chapter 4: Elicitation and Collaboration3

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should assess the situation to understand how the organization’s culture impacts the decision-making process, and coach the team toward a new model. This is because the project manager is responsible for facilitating the team’s decision-making process and ensuring that it aligns with the agile principles and values1. The project manager should also consider the following factors that may affect the team’s decision-making process2:

The level of empowerment and autonomy given to the team by the organization and the stakeholders

The degree of collaboration and communication among the team members and with other parties

The availability and quality of information and data to support the decision-making process

The complexity and uncertainty of the project environment and the product requirements

The time and resource constraints and the impact of delays on the project outcomes

The potential risks and opportunities associated with the decisions and the alternatives

The feedback and learning mechanisms to evaluate and improve the decision-making process

The project manager should coach the team toward a new model of decision-making that is more agile and adaptive, such as the following3:

Decentralized decision-making: The team members are empowered to make decisions within their scope of work and authority, without waiting for approval from higher levels of management. This can increase the team’s speed, efficiency, and ownership of the decisions.

Collaborative decision-making: The team members work together to make decisions that benefit the project and the stakeholders, rather than competing or conflicting with each other. This can enhance the team’s creativity, innovation, and quality of the decisions.

Data-driven decision-making: The team members use empirical evidence and data to support their decisions, rather than relying on assumptions or opinions. This can improve the team’s accuracy, reliability, and transparency of the decisions.

Iterative decision-making: The team members make decisions in small increments and cycles, rather than in large batches and phases. This can allow the team to adapt to changing conditions and feedback, and to deliver value early and frequently.

Value-based decision-making: The team members make decisions that maximize the value delivered to the customer and the stakeholders, rather than focusing on the cost or the schedule. This can ensure the team’s alignment with the project vision and goals.

References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 9.4.2.3

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 9.4.2.4

Decision-Making Models: Five Agile Methods to Help You

The project manager should determine the value of the vendor’s bid by calculating the expected monetary value (EMV) of the bid. The EMV is the product of the probability and the impact of a risk event or opportunity1. In this case, the vendor’s bid has two possible outcomes: a cost overrun of US$100,000 with a 65% probability, or a cost saving of US$50,000 with a 35% probability. The EMV of the bid is calculated as follows:

EMV = (0.65 x 100,000) - (0.35 x 50,000) = 47,500

The value of the vendor’s bid is the original bid amount plus the EMV, which is:

Value = 500,000 + 47,500 = 547,500

Therefore, the correct answer is C. US$547,500.

References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 11.5.2.2, “Expected Monetary Value Analysis”

According to the PMBOK Guide, project managers should apply adaptive planning and agile practices to respond to changes and uncertainties in complex projects. Adaptive planning involves frequent reviews and adjustments of the project scope, schedule, cost, and quality based on the feedback and learning from the project execution. Agile practices emphasize delivering value to the customer by prioritizing the most important features and requirements and delivering them in increments1.

In this scenario, the project manager faces a situation where one feature cannot be fixed before the go-live date, which impacts the project schedule and quality. The project manager should apply adaptive planning and agile practices to determine the best course of action. The project manager should evaluate the value and importance of the feature to the customer and the project objectives. If the feature is not critical or essential, the project manager should consider delivering the project without the feature and fixing the defects later, after the go-live milestone. This way, the project can still deliver value to the customer and meet the expectations of the stakeholders. The project manager should communicate this decision to the customer and the stakeholders and obtain their agreement and feedback1.

The other options are not as suitable as option D. Option A involves updating the risk management plan and including additional mitigation actions against the feature defects. However, this option does not address the impact on the go-live milestone or the customer value. It also assumes that the feature defects can be mitigated, which contradicts the premise of the question. Option B involves assessing the relevance of the feature and submitting a change request to descope it. However, this option does not consider the customer value or the feedback from the customer and the stakeholders. It also implies that the feature is not important or valuable, which may not be the case. Option C involves improving the control quality process by implementing additional testing to minimize the defects before the go-live milestone. However, this option does not acknowledge the fact that there is no way to resolve the defects before the go-live date, as stated in the question. It also does not consider the impact on the project schedule and cost, or the customer value1.

References:

1: Project Management Institute. (2023). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition. Newtown Square, PA: Author.

A RAM is a tool that maps the project work packages or activities to the project team members or roles. It helps to define and assign the responsibilities, accountabilities, and authorities of each team member for each project task. It also helps to identify and resolve any gaps, overlaps, or conflicts in the resource allocation. A RAM can be presented in various formats, such as a RACI chart, a RASCI chart, or a linear responsibility chart12.

Developing an approved RAM can help the project manager to manage the team effectively, especially when some team members, such as the site engineers, may not be fully focused on the project due to other priorities or constraints. A RAM can help the project manager to communicate and clarify the expectations and deliverables of each team member, and to monitor and control their performance and progress. A RAM can also help the project manager to coordinate and collaborate with the other stakeholders, such as the production managers, to ensure that the project and the production imperatives are aligned and balanced34.

The other options are not as effective or relevant for managing the team:

B. Commit each team member’s time and deliverables and aim for overall project completion: Committing each team member’s time and deliverables is important, but it may not be sufficient or realistic to manage the team, especially when some team members, such as the site engineers, may have competing or conflicting demands on their time and attention. Aiming for overall project completion is a desirable goal, but it may not be achievable or sustainable without proper planning, communication, and coordination among the team members and the other stakeholders.

C. Continue the project implementation without the site engineers to ensure the schedule is maintained: Continuing the project implementation without the site engineers may not be feasible or advisable, as the site engineers may have critical skills, knowledge, or experience that are essential for the project success. Excluding the site engineers from the project may also create risks, issues, or gaps in the project quality, scope, or integration. Moreover, it may damage the relationship and trust between the project manager and the site engineers, and reduce their motivation and commitment to the project.

D. Contract external resources to fulfill the role of the site engineers who cannot sup-port the project: Contracting external resources may be an option to supplement or replace the internal resources, such as the site engineers, who cannot support the project. However, this option may not be the best or the first choice, as it may involve additional costs, time, or risks for the project. Contracting external resources may also require approval, negotiation, or procurement processes that may delay or complicate the project. Furthermore, it may affect the morale, loyalty, or performance of the internal resources, who may feel threatened, replaced, or undervalued by the external resources.

References:

1: Responsibility Assignment Matrix - Project Management Knowledge 2: What is a Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM) in Project Management? 3: How to Create a Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM) for Your Project 4: How to Use a RACI Matrix to Manage Project Resources : [Project Team Management: How to Manage Your Team Effectively] : [How to Manage Project Team Conflicts] : [Project Procurement Management: The Ultimate Guide]

In agile projects, risks are assessed and managed continuously through regular feedback loops, such as daily standups, iteration demos, and retrospectives. These feedback loops allow the team to identify, analyze, prioritize, and respond to risks in a timely and collaborative manner. They also help the team to monitor and control the project performance and deliver value to the customer. Identifying and escalating risks to the facilitator is not an effective way of managing risks, as it does not involve the whole team or the customer. Updating the risk register during every iteration is a good practice, but it is not enough to assess and manage risks regularly. Focusing on developing a working deliverable instead of documenting risks is not a good option, as it ignores the potential impact of risks on the project outcome and quality. References: = PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 97; PMI, Project Management Professional (PMP) Examination Content Outline, 2021, page 8.

 According to the PMP Exam Content Outline, a project manager should select the appropriate project approach based on the project characteristics, such as the degree of uncertainty, complexity, and stakeholder involvement. A hybrid approach combines elements of predictive and adaptive (agile, iterative, incremental) approaches to suit the specific needs and context of the project. In this case, a hybrid approach would allow the project manager to accommodate the potential changes from the new CEO, while also ensuring the delivery of the correct sales results as the final product. A hybrid approach would also enable the project manager to collaborate with the customer and the development team to refine the requirements and validate the solution throughout the project life cycle. A predictive approach would not be suitable for this project, as it assumes a high level of certainty and stability in the requirements and the environment, which is not the case here. An incremental approach would deliver the product in smaller increments, which may not meet the customer’s expectation of no intermediate results. An iterative approach would repeat the same phases until the product meets the desired quality, which may not be efficient or effective for this project. References: = PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain I: People, Task 1: Manage conflict, page 6. PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain III: Business Environment, Task 2: Select project approach, page 14. PMBOK Guide, Chapter 1: Introduction, Section 1.2: Foundational Elements, page 9. PBA Guide, Chapter 2: Needs Assessment, Section 2.2: Assess Current State of the Organization, page 33.

According to the PMBOK Guide, change requests are inevitable in any project and should be managed through an integrated change control process. This process involves analyzing the impact of the change on the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, quality, risk, and other factors, and then deciding whether to approve or reject the change. If the change is approved, the project manager should update the project management plan and other relevant documents accordingly. The project manager should also communicate and negotiate with the stakeholders, especially the client, about the impact of the change and the possible trade-offs or alternatives. The project manager should not instruct the team to accommodate the changes without proper analysis and approval, as this would violate the project management plan and the agreed scope. The project manager should not review the project charter to identify the agreed scope, as this would not address the issue of the change requests and their impact on the project. The project charter is a high-level document that authorizes the project and defines its objectives, scope, and key stakeholders, but it does not provide the details of how the scope will be managed and controlled. The project manager should not escalate the issue to senior management, as this would imply that the project manager is unable to handle the change requests and their impact on the project. The project manager should only escalate the issue if the change requests are beyond the project manager’s authority or responsibility, or if the client is unreasonable or uncooperative. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 112-113, 118-119, 122-123; Project and Process Tailoring for the PMP® Exam

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager is responsible for developing the project schedule and estimating the activity durations. One of the tools and techniques for estimating activity durations is decomposition, which involves subdividing the project work packages into smaller, more manageable components called activities. By breaking down the project into smaller tasks, the project manager can better understand the scope, complexity, and dependencies of the work, and apply more accurate and reliable estimation methods. This will also help the project manager to identify and manage the risks and uncertainties associated with the project schedule. Therefore, the project manager should break down the project into smaller tasks and estimate the durations of the activities as the next step. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 191-192, 201-202.

According to the PMBOK Guide, a project manager should put any new requirements in the backlog and submit a formal change request for approval, when a change in project scope is requested by a stakeholder. This is part of the perform integrated change control process, which involves reviewing and approving all change requests that affect the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources, communications, risks, procurements, or stakeholder engagement. A formal change request is a document that describes the proposed change, its justification, its impact, and its alternatives. A formal change request should be submitted to the change control board (CCB), which is a group of stakeholders authorized to approve or reject changes. The CCB should evaluate the change request based on the project objectives, the project management plan, the project documents, and the stakeholder expectations. The CCB should also consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of the change, as well as its alignment with the project charter and the business case. The CCB should then communicate the decision to the project manager and the relevant stakeholders, and update the project documents and the project management plan accordingly. This process ensures a consistent and transparent approach to managing changes, and prevents scope creep or unauthorized changes that could negatively affect the project performance or quality. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 115-116, 121-122.

According to the PMBOK Guide, a workstream is a logical grouping of project activities that produces a specific deliverable or sub-deliverable within a project. A workstream leader is the person who is responsible for planning, executing, monitoring, and controlling the workstream activities and deliverables. A functional manager is the person who has management authority over an organizational unit, such as a department, within a functional organization1.

In this scenario, the project manager faces a situation where one of the workstreams has missed its deadline multiple times, affecting the project schedule and performance. The project manager should speak to the workstream leader and the functional manager about this situation to ensure it does not happen again. The project manager should communicate with the workstream leader to understand the root causes of the delays, identify the risks and issues, and agree on the corrective and preventive actions. The project manager should also communicate with the functional manager to obtain the necessary resources, support, and guidance for the workstream leader and the workstream team. The project manager should facilitate the collaboration and coordination between the workstream leader and the functional manager to ensure the alignment of expectations, objectives, and deliverables1.

The other options are not as suitable as option C. Option A involves speaking to the workstream leader and the project sponsor. The project sponsor is the person or group who provides resources and support for the project and is accountable for enabling success1. However, the project sponsor is not directly involved in the management or execution of the workstream activities and deliverables. The project sponsor may not have the detailed knowledge or authority to address the specific issues or challenges faced by the workstream leader and the workstream team. Option B involves speaking to the workstream leader alone. This option may not be sufficient to resolve the situation, as the workstream leader may need the support and assistance of other managers or stakeholders to overcome the delays and improve the workstream performance. Option D involves speaking to the workstream leader and the project management office (PMO). The PMO is an organizational structure that standardizes the project-related governance processes and facilitates the sharing of resources, methodologies, tools, and techniques1. However, the PMO may not have the direct responsibility or authority over the workstream activities and deliverables. The PMO may not be able to provide the specific resources, support, or guidance needed by the workstream leader and the workstream team1.

References:

1: Project Management Institute. (2023). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition. Newtown Square, PA: Author.

According to the PMP Exam Content Outline, one of the tasks under the domain of Business Environment is to plan and manage project compliance, which includes confirming project compliance requirements and classifying compliance categories. Compliance requirements are the rules and regulations that the project must follow to meet the standards of quality, safety, security, and legality. Compliance categories are the types of compliance requirements that apply to the project, such as security, health and safety, regulatory, environmental, etc. Compliance requirements and categories may vary depending on the industry, country, and organization of the project. Therefore, the project manager should not assume that there are no compliance requirements for the project based on the sponsor’s knowledge, but should seek expert advice from the compliance leader, who is the person responsible for ensuring that the project meets the compliance standards and requirements. The compliance leader can help the project manager confirm if there are any compliance requirements for the project, and if so, what they are and how to comply with them. This will help the project manager avoid the risks and consequences of non-compliance, such as fines, penalties, lawsuits, reputation damage, or project failure. The other options are not correct because they do not involve consulting the compliance leader, who is the best source of information and guidance on compliance matters. Checking with the national compliance agency may not be sufficient, as there may be other compliance requirements at the regional, local, or organizational level. Trusting in the expertise of the sponsor may be risky, as the sponsor may not be aware of all the compliance requirements or changes that may affect the project. Conducting independent research may be helpful, but it may not be comprehensive, accurate, or up-to-date, and it may not address the specific needs and context of the project. References:

PMP Exam Content Outline

How compliance in project management works1

3.1 Plan and Manage Project Compliance2

According to the PMBOK® Guide 6th Edition, the project manager should provide the failed test results along with the agreed-upon acceptance criteria to support their claim to the vendor. This is because the acceptance criteria are the measurable and verifiable standards that define the quality requirements of the project deliverables. The project manager and the vendor should have agreed on the acceptance criteria before signing the contract. Therefore, providing the failed test results along with the acceptance criteria will show the vendor that they have not met their contractual obligations and that they need to take corrective actions to improve the system quality. References: PMBOK® Guide 6th Edition, page 161, section 5.5.2.1; page 287, section 8.2.2.1; page 375, section 12.1.2.1.

 The forming phase of a project team is when team members are uncertain about the team’s purpose, their roles, and how to work together1. The project manager’s job is to help the team overcome this uncertainty by clarifying the team goals, expectations, and norms2. One of the tools that can help the project manager in this stage is to assess and analyze the personality indicators of the team members, such as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) or the DiSC profile. These tools can help the project manager understand the preferences, strengths, and weaknesses of each team member, and how they interact with others3. By doing so, the project manager can tailor the team-building activities to suit the needs and preferences of the team, and avoid activities that might cause discomfort, frustration, or conflict among the team members. For example, improvisation theater activities might be fun for some team members who enjoy spontaneity, creativity, and humor, but they might be stressful or awkward for others who prefer structure, planning, and logic. Therefore, the project manager should have assessed and analyzed the personality indicators of the team before choosing such an activity, and consulted with the team members to ensure that they are comfortable and willing to participate. Alternatively, the project manager could have chosen a different team-building activity that is more suitable for the forming stage, such as icebreakers, introductions, or games that help the team members get to know each other better4. References:

1: The 5 Stages of Team Development (Including Examples) | Upwork

2: Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing for Agile teams | Scrum.org

3: Team Development Cycle: From Forming To Performing - Teamhood

4: 45 Team Building Games to Psych Up Your Team [2023] • Asana

The kick-off meeting is the formal start of the project or a project phase. It is an opportunity for the project manager to communicate the project objectives, scope, schedule, risks, assumptions, and expectations to the project team and other stakeholders. It also helps to establish the team roles and responsibilities, the communication plan, the ground rules, and the team culture. The kick-off meeting is part of the Develop Project Management Plan process, which belongs to the Planning process group. The other options are not the actions that the project manager should do in this phase, as they are either part of other processes or not relevant to the project baseline schedule development. References:

[PMBOK Guide], 6th edition, pages 89-90, 123-124, 513-514.

[Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) Handbook], pages 15-16, 19-20.

When a project manager identifies that the response action for an issue is insufficient, it is crucial to take immediate action to prevent further complications. The best course of action in this scenario is to meet with the project team to find another solution1. This approach ensures that all team members are aware of the issue and can contribute their expertise and ideas to resolving it. It also promotes transparency and collaboration within the team1. The other options (A, B, C) are also important steps in issue management, but they are not the immediate next steps when a response action has proven to be insufficient2. References: 12

According to the AI & SOCIETY article1, legal structures may form barriers to, or enablers of, adoption of precision agriculture management with small autonomous agricultural robots. The article develops a conceptual regulatory framework for small autonomous agricultural robots, from a practical, self-contained engineering guide perspective, sufficient to get working research and commercial agricultural roboticists quickly and easily up and running within the law. The article examines the liability framework, or rather lack of it, for agricultural robotics in EU, and their transpositions to UK law, as a case study illustrating general international legal concepts and issues. It examines how the law may provide mitigating effects on the liability regime, and how contracts can be developed between agents within it to enable smooth operation. It covers other legal aspects of operation such as the use of shared communications resources and privacy in the reuse of robot-collected data. Where there are some grey areas in current law, it argues that new proposals could be developed to reform these to promote further innovation and investment in agricultural robots. Therefore, the lack of a proper legal framework in place for the automation project may be the reason why the elected officials warned the project manager that the project cannot proceed, as they may face legal uncertainties, risks, or challenges that could affect the project’s feasibility, legitimacy, or acceptability. References: AI & SOCIETY article1

 Schedule reserves are the amount of time allocated for unforeseen risks or delays in a project. They are usually calculated based on the level of uncertainty and complexity of the project. In a hybrid project, where both agile and predictive approaches are used, the project manager should reconsider the necessary schedule reserves based on the progress and performance of each module. By doing so, the project manager can identify the critical path, prioritize the work, and adjust the schedule accordingly. This can help to take the schedule back and accelerate the ROI of the project. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, Chapter 8.3.3.2; Agile Practice Guide, Section 3.2.2.

According to the PMBOK Guide, closing a project or phase is the process of finalizing all activities across all of the project management process groups to formally complete the project or phase1 One of the main outputs of this process is the final product, service, or result transition, which involves transferring the ownership and accountability of the project deliverables to the customer, sponsor, or other designated entity1 Another important output is the project documents updates, which involves archiving all the project documents following the organization’s accepted practices so that they can be used in other future projects1 Archiving the project documents ensures that the project information is properly stored, organized, and accessible for future reference, lessons learned, audits, or legal purposes2 Some examples of project documents that should be archived are the project charter, the project management plan, the project scope statement, the work breakdown structure, the project schedule, the project budget, the quality reports, the risk register, the issue log, the change log, the stakeholder register, the lessons learned register, and the project closure report12

In the given scenario, the project manager is instructed by the project sponsor to immediately close the project and to move on to another project. The project manager should complete the critical task of archiving all the project documents before closing the project. This will ensure that the project information is preserved and available for future use, and that the project closure is done in a systematic and consistent manner2

The other options are not the best choices for the following reasons:

Option A: Ensure that the whole team is appropriately recognized and organize a project farewell party to celebrate the project success and closure. This option suggests recognizing the project team and celebrating the project success and closure. While this is a good practice to motivate and appreciate the project team, it is not the most critical task that the project manager should complete before closing the project. The project manager should first ensure that the project deliverables are transferred to the customer or sponsor, and that the project documents are archived, before organizing any recognition or celebration events2

Option B: Update and close both the risk register and issue log with the latest updates, and save them in the organization’s project management information system (PMIS). This option suggests updating and closing the risk register and issue log, and saving them in the PMIS. While this is a necessary task to document and communicate the status and resolution of the project risks and issues, it is not the only task that the project manager should complete before closing the project. The project manager should also update and archive other project documents, such as the project charter, the project management plan, the project scope statement, the work breakdown structure, the project schedule, the project budget, the quality reports, the change log, the stakeholder register, the lessons learned register, and the project closure report12

Option D: Meet with the project sponsor and advise that the new project might be difficult to undertake because the current project is not yet complete. This option suggests meeting with the project sponsor and advising that the new project might be difficult to undertake because the current project is not yet complete. While this is a valid concern that the project manager should raise with the project sponsor, it is not the most critical task that the project manager should complete before closing the project. The project manager should first finalize all the activities and deliverables of the current project, and archive all the project documents, before moving on to another project2

References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 3: Doing the Work, Section 3.6: Close the Project or Phase, pp. 80-81 2: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 3: Doing the Work, Section 3.6.2: Close the Project or Phase: Outputs, pp. 82-83

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager is responsible for identifying, analyzing, and responding to project risks. One of the tools and techniques for risk management is perform qualitative risk analysis, which involves assessing the probability and impact of identified risks on project objectives. When a risk occurs, such as the change in the wire compatibility, the project manager should first perform qualitative risk analysis to determine the severity and urgency of the risk response. The project manager should also consult with the project team and other relevant stakeholders to evaluate the potential options and alternatives for addressing the risk. One of the possible options is to survey the market for alternative wires with similar characteristics that can be compatible with the machine. This option may require some adjustments in the design or testing of the machine, but it may also preserve the market coverage and customer satisfaction. Therefore, the project manager should investigate the impact of this option with the team and compare it with other possible options before making a decision. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 397-398, 423-424.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, one of the project management principles is to “engage stakeholders to understand their interests and needs”. This means that the project manager should communicate with the stakeholder and clarify the scope, objectives, and expectations of the project. The project manager should also explain the impact of the stakeholder’s interruptions and changes on the team’s performance and morale, and negotiate a mutually acceptable way to handle the stakeholder’s requests. The project manager should also update the stakeholder register and the stakeholder engagement plan to reflect the stakeholder’s influence and engagement level, and monitor the stakeholder’s satisfaction throughout the project. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48…

A team member assessment is a process that evaluates the skills, knowledge, abilities, and preferences of the project team members, as well as their availability, accessibility, and potential issues1. This process can help identify the needs and expectations of the team members, including those with hearing impairment, and plan for appropriate accommodations and adjustments.

Some examples of accommodations and adjustments for hearing impaired team members are:

Providing written materials, such as agendas, minutes, and reports, before and after meetings2

Using visual aids, such as charts, diagrams, and slides, to supplement verbal communication2

Ensuring adequate lighting, acoustics, and seating arrangements in meeting rooms23

Using assistive technologies, such as hearing aids, cochlear implants, captioning, and sign language interpreters23

Encouraging respectful and inclusive behavior, such as speaking clearly, facing the speaker, and avoiding background noise23

1: Guideline for the Audiologic Management of Adult Hearing Impairment 2: Managing hearing impairment in the workplace - My Business 3: Architecture for People with Hearing Loss: 6 Design Tips

The best way to ensure that the client is effectively represented in the daily meetings is to provide them with the necessary agile knowledge and skills to participate and collaborate with the vendor team. This can be done by proposing a session for essential agile knowledge transfer, where the vendor project manager can explain the agile principles, values, practices, and tools that will be used in the project. This will help the client team to understand the purpose and benefits of the daily meetings, as well as their roles and responsibilities in them. The other options are not as effective as they either do not address the root cause of the problem (lack of agile knowledge), or they introduce unnecessary changes or delays to the project (realigning the project or recommending training programs). References: PMI Agile Practice Guide, page 14-15; PMBOK Guide, page 18-19

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 5.3.2, in an agile product development environment, the project manager should facilitate communication and collaboration among the teams, especially when they are geographically dispersed. The project manager should also ensure that the teams follow a relay pattern of handing off work from one team to the other, which means that each team completes its work and passes it on to the next team in a timely and efficient manner. This way, the teams can deliver the sprints with high quality and customer satisfaction. The project manager should not isolate the teams, ignore the communication issues, or avoid the risks, as these actions would jeopardize the success of the project. References:

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 5.3.2, page 157-158

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition

PMP Exam Content Outline

A relative-weighting approach is a technique that assigns numerical values to the benefits and costs of each product feature, and then calculates a score for each feature by dividing the benefits by the costs. The features with the highest scores are considered the most valuable and are prioritized accordingly. This technique is part of the Collect Requirements process, which involves defining and documenting the stakeholders’ needs and expectations for the project outcome1. To perform this technique effectively, the project manager should ask the team to perform collaborative work that is coordinated by the project manager. This will ensure that the team members share their inputs, opinions, and preferences, and that the project manager facilitates the process and resolves any conflicts or issues. Relying on the expert judgment of the product owner, using a market-based strategy, or engaging the project sponsor are not the best options, as they may not reflect the views and needs of all the stakeholders, or they may introduce bias or external influences into the prioritization process. References: 1 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 140.

The question is about a project that faces a potential threat from a competitor’s product launch using the same innovation. The project manager needs to assess the impact of this threat on the project’s objectives and take appropriate actions to mitigate it. The best option for the project manager to do next is:

Document the issue in the issue log and escalate to the project sponsor: This option is proactive and follows the best practice of issue management. The project manager should document the issue, its impact, and possible solutions in the issue log, which is a tool for tracking and resolving issues that affect the project. The project manager should also escalate the issue to the project sponsor, who is the person or group that provides the resources and support for the project. The project sponsor can help the project manager to evaluate the options and make decisions that align with the project’s goals and business strategy12

The other options are not as effective or appropriate as the first option. They are:

Inform the project sponsor and suggest canceling the project: This option is premature and pessimistic. The project manager should not suggest canceling the project without analyzing the situation and exploring alternatives. Canceling the project might result in wasted resources, lost opportunities, and damaged reputation. The project manager should work with the project sponsor to find ways to overcome the threat and deliver value to the customer3

Review the project goals and eat criteria m the project charter: This option is passive and incomplete. The project manager should review the project goals and acceptance criteria in the project charter, which is a document that authorizes the project and defines its scope, objectives, and stakeholders. However, this is not enough to address the issue. The project manager should also document the issue, communicate with the project sponsor, and take actions to resolve the issue4

Ask the leader of research and development to decide on next steps: This option is irresponsible and risky. The project manager should not delegate the decision-making to the leader of research and development, who might not have the authority, responsibility, or knowledge to handle the issue. The project manager should consult with the leader of research and development, who is a subject matter expert, but the project manager should also involve the project sponsor, who is the project owner, and other relevant stakeholders, who might be affected by the issue. The project manager should lead the issue resolution process and ensure that the decisions are aligned with the project’s goals and business strategy.

References: 1: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.4.3.1 2: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Chapter 8, Section 8.4.2 3: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 2, Section 2.4.3 4: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.1.3.1 : A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 13, Section 13.2.2.4

The project manager should schedule a session with the team to discuss the issues and work with them to define a plan to manage the sprints going forward. This will help to address the team’s concerns, resolve the conflicts, and improve the team’s morale and performance. The project manager should also communicate with the product owner and other stakeholders to align the expectations and priorities for the project and the support items. The project manager should also use agile principles and practices to adapt to the changing requirements and deliver value to the customer. Requesting a replacement, scheduling a session with the product owner, or asking HR to send the team members to a workshop are not the best ways to proceed, as they may not solve the root cause of the problem, damage the team’s trust and cohesion, or delay the project delivery. References:

PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain II: Process, Task 5: Support team members and stakeholders to meet project objectives and stakeholder expectations.

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Seventh Edition, Chapter 3: Project Performance Domain, Section 3.2: Team Performance, Page 77.

Professional in Business Analysis (PBA) Certification Exam Outline, Domain III: Analysis, Task 5: Validate Requirements, Page 14.

Diagram Description automatically generated

The statement of work (SOW) is a document that describes the project scope, deliverables, acceptance criteria, assumptions, and constraints1. It is usually part of the contract between the buyer and the seller2. If the project manager remembers negotiating and agreeing to the deliverable during the tender process, they should look to see if the deliverable is described in the SOW, which would be a contractual obligation for the seller. Requesting a change in the contract, adding the deliverable to the requirements traceability matrix, or terminating the contract are not appropriate actions in this situation. References:

1 PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 154

2 PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 473

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 13.2.2.4, stakeholder engagement assessment matrix is a tool that can be used to identify the current and desired levels of engagement for each stakeholder or stakeholder group. The project manager should use this matrix to plan and implement appropriate strategies to increase the support and minimize the resistance of the stakeholders. One of the strategies is to meet with the stakeholder and discuss the impact of the project deliverable on their interests, needs, and expectations. The project manager should also explain the benefits of the deliverable for the organization and the stakeholder, and address any concerns or issues that the stakeholder may have. By doing so, the project manager can increase the stakeholder’s awareness, understanding, and involvement in the project, and foster a positive relationship with them. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 13.2.2.4; PMI website

The project manager should update the risk register next. The risk register is a document that records the identified risks, their causes, impacts, probabilities, responses, owners, and other relevant information. Updating the risk register is part of the Monitor Risks process, which involves tracking the identified risks, monitoring residual risks, identifying new risks, executing risk responses, and evaluating their effectiveness. In this scenario, the low availability of the testing facility is a potential risk that could affect the project schedule. Therefore, the project manager should update the risk register with this information and plan appropriate risk responses. This option aligns with the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, which states that “the risk register is updated as outputs from other risk management processes are completed” (p. 436). The other options are not the best choices because they do not address the risk of the testing facility’s low availability. Updating the issue log (option B) is not appropriate because the issue log is a document that records and monitors the resolution of issues that have occurred or are currently occurring on the project. In this case, the low availability of the testing facility is not an issue yet, but a potential risk that may or may not occur in the future. Updating the lessons learned register (option C) is not relevant because the lessons learned register is a document that captures the knowledge gained from the project, including the challenges, problems, risks, and opportunities encountered and how they were addressed. In this scenario, the project manager has not yet learned any lessons from the testing facility’s low availability, as it is still a potential risk. Updating the project schedule (option D) is premature because the project schedule is a document that presents the planned dates for performing activities and meeting milestones. In this case, the project manager has not yet determined the impact or probability of the testing facility’s low availability, or the risk responses to deal with it. Therefore, updating the project schedule without this information may result in inaccurate or unrealistic estimates. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 436 1

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 123 2

 The project manager should use mentoring and coaching as an activity to help train the stakeholders who need help understanding how to deal with difficult situations. Mentoring and coaching are techniques that involve providing guidance, feedback, and support to individuals or groups to improve their performance, skills, or behavior. Mentoring and coaching can help stakeholders overcome challenges, learn from experiences, and achieve their goals. This option aligns with the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, which states that “mentoring and coaching are used to help team members and other stakeholders enhance their project management competencies or to address issues and concerns” (p. 349). The other options are not the best choices because they are not activities that directly help train the stakeholders on how to deal with difficult situations. Contract negotiation (option A) is a technique that involves discussing and agreeing on the terms and conditions of a contract between two or more parties. Contract negotiation is not a training activity, but a procurement activity that may involve some stakeholders, such as the buyer and seller. Team assessment (option B) is a technique that involves evaluating the performance, skills, and competencies of the project team members. Team assessment is not a training activity, but a monitoring and controlling activity that may provide feedback and recommendations for improvement. On-the-job training (option D) is a technique that involves providing instruction and practice to individuals or groups while they perform their regular work tasks. On-the-job training is a training activity, but it is not specific to dealing with difficult situations. It is more suitable for developing technical or operational skills. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 349 1

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 480 2

In project management, especially in an agile environment, collaboration and communication are key. When there is a delay in the validation and release of a product due to other priorities, the project manager should work with the IT team to prioritize the tasks. This approach promotes teamwork, ensures everyone is on the same page, and helps to address the issue in a constructive manner. Escalating the issue (option A) might not be the best initial approach as it could create unnecessary tension. Delivering the features without validation (option C and D) could lead to quality issues and is generally not a good practice. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th Edition, Section 9.3.2.1: Team Charter

 According to the PMBOK Guide, a project manager should refer to the communications management plan, when facing issues with both the agile delivery of the product and the predictive development of a marketing strategy, and needing to receive feedback from stakeholders located in different time zones. The communications management plan is a component of the project management plan that describes how the project information will be planned, managed, monitored, and controlled. It also defines the communication requirements, methods, formats, frequency, and channels for each stakeholder group. The communications management plan should address the challenges and opportunities of working in a hybrid project environment, where both agile and predictive approaches are used. The communications management plan should also consider the diversity and distribution of the stakeholders, and ensure that the feedback mechanisms are appropriate, timely, and effective. By referring to the communications management plan, the project manager can ensure that the project communication is aligned with the project objectives, stakeholder expectations, and project methodology. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 89-90, 377-378.

According to the PMBOK Guide, stakeholder engagement is the process of identifying the people, groups, or organizations that could impact or be impacted by the project, analyzing their expectations and influence, and developing appropriate strategies to effectively engage them in project decisions and execution. Stakeholder engagement is especially important for projects that involve virtual teams, as they may face challenges such as communication barriers, cultural differences, lack of trust, and low visibility. By performing stakeholder engagement with the virtual team, the project manager can ensure that the team members are aware of the project objectives, requirements, and deliverables, and that they receive timely and constructive feedback, recognition, and support. This can help improve the team’s performance, motivation, and collaboration, and ultimately lead to better project outcomes. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 513-514, 540-541; PMP Practice Exam, question 4.

The project manager should first follow the risk response plan. The risk response plan is a component of the project management plan that describes how to implement risk responses for identified risks and opportunities1. It includes the agreed-upon actions and owners for each risk, as well as the budget, schedule, and resources allocated for the risk responses1. By following the risk response plan, the project manager can execute the appropriate actions to minimize the impact of the delay on the critical path activity and the project objectives.

Option B is not the best answer because using the contingency fund is not the first thing to do. The contingency fund is a reserve amount of money or time that is set aside to cover the cost or time impact of known risks2. It is part of the risk response plan, and it should be used only after the risk response actions have been implemented and the residual risk impact has been assessed3.

Option C is not the best answer because preparing a change request is not the first thing to do. A change request is a formal proposal to modify any document, deliverable, or baseline of the project. It should be prepared only after the risk response actions have been implemented and the impact of the delay on the project scope, schedule, cost, or quality has been analyzed.

Option D is not the best answer because updating the risk register is not the first thing to do. The risk register is a project document that records the details of all identified risks, including their description, category, probability, impact, response strategy, and status. It should be updated only after the risk response actions have been implemented and the outcome of the risk response has been evaluated. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 11.1.3.1, Risk Response Plan 2: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 6.5.2.3, Contingency Reserve 3: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 11.5.3.1, Implement Risk Responses : PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 4.6.3.1, Change Requests : PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 4.6.3.2, Change Control Tools : PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 11.2.3.1, Risk Register : PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 11.6.3.1, Monitor Risks