Salesforce Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (October 2025)

Super User Permission: In Salesforce, the "Super User" permission allows partner community users in specific roles (such as Partner Managers) to access records owned by or shared with users within their partner account. This is an effective and scalable solution for giving partner manager users access to all case and container records for users at the same distributor.

Why Option B is Correct: Granting Super User permissions is straightforward, scalable, and avoids complex configurations such as ownership-based sharing rules or sharing sets.

Why Others Are Incorrect:

Option A: Ownership-based sharing rules are not ideal because they do not accommodate scalability and flexibility across multiple distributors.

Option C: Sharing sets provide access based on the account relationship, but they are limited in scope compared to the flexibility provided by Super User permissions.

For detailed information on Super User permissions, refer to the Salesforce documentation on Partner Communities: https://help.salesforce.com/

When implementing Apex managed sharing, it is crucial to test the sharing logic to ensure users are granted appropriate access to records. The runAs method allows developers to simulate record access for different users during testing, ensuring the implemented sharing logic functions correctly.

Option A: Using "Without Sharing" disables sharing enforcement, which is not appropriate for Apex-managed sharing scenarios.

Option B: The "With Sharing" keyword enforces sharing rules in the code but is not relevant for testing user access.

Option C (Correct): The runAs method is a best practice for simulating user-specific access during tests, ensuring the logic aligns with the organization’s sharing rules.

References:

Apex Managed Sharing

runAs Method in Test Classes

List View Sharing: Salesforce allows list views to be shared with roles, roles and subordinates, public groups, or individual users. To manage visibility of list views for users effectively, sharing with roles and internal subordinates ensures only relevant users within the organizational hierarchy see the list views.

Why Option A is Correct:

Sharing with roles and internal subordinates limits access to users in specific roles and their reporting lines, reducing clutter for irrelevant users.

This method is scalable for organizations with many list views and users.

Why Others Are Incorrect:

Option B: Sharing with individual users is not scalable when there are numerous list views and users.

Option C: Queues are not used to manage list view sharing in this scenario.

For more details, refer to Salesforce documentation on managing list view visibility: https://help.salesforce.com/

The organization-wide default (OWD) for Pricebook should be set to Use to allow sales agents to view pricebooks and their products, as well as to select a pricebook when creating Opportunities. The Use access enables users to add products from the pricebook to their opportunities while preventing unauthorized changes to the pricebook or its entries. Setting the OWD to Public Read-Only or View could provide unnecessary access or restrict essential functionality, such as associating products with opportunities. (developer.salesforce.com)

Field-level security (FLS) defines which fields a user can view or edit. If a user can see some fields (like Name, Created Date, etc.) but not others, the issue is likely related to FLS settings on the user's profile.

Option A: Role-based sharing rules control record access, not field access.

Option B (Correct): The Sales User profile likely lacks FLS access for the fields in question. Adjusting the profile or permission sets to grant visibility to these fields will resolve the issue.

Option C: Page layouts define which fields are displayed but cannot override field-level security. If the profile lacks FLS access, the fields won’t appear regardless of the layout.

References:

Field-Level Security Overview

The Partner Community license is designed for use cases requiring access to Opportunities, Campaigns, Leads, and other sales-related records. In this scenario:

Distributors need to use the community to see closing Opportunities.

The Partner Community license is optimized for external users involved in a sales process, like distributors, and offers full access to the Opportunity object.

Option A: Customer Community Plus provides limited access to objects and is not suitable for collaboration on sales records like Opportunities.

Option C: Customer Community licenses are insufficient because they don't support access to Opportunities.

References:

Community Licenses Overview

Reports saved in the Private Reports folder are only accessible to the user who created them. This folder is meant for personal use, and other users cannot access or view reports saved here, regardless of their permissions.

Why Option A is Correct: Only the report owner can view and run reports saved in the "Private Reports" folder.

Why Others Are Incorrect:

Option B: There is no way to share reports in the "Private Reports" folder with other users.

Option C: Even users with "View All Data" permission cannot access reports in the "Private Reports" folder.

For further details, refer to Salesforce Report and Dashboard Sharing documentation: https://help.salesforce.com/

Role Hierarchy and Sharing Rules:

Role Hierarchies ensure that users higher in the hierarchy can see records owned by users below them.

Sharing Rules extend access beyond Role Hierarchies by allowing record visibility based on criteria such as geographic location.

Why Option A is Correct:

Configuring the Role Hierarchy ensures branch managers can see customer records for their branch.

Sharing Rules can be configured to grant branch staff access to records within their geographic location.

Why Others Are Incorrect:

Option B: Account Teams are not the appropriate solution here because they are designed for manual sharing rather than automatic sharing based on geography.

Option C: Organization-wide defaults (OWD) and sharing rules alone do not provide sufficient control for branch-specific access.

For more details, refer to Salesforce documentation on Role Hierarchies and Sharing Rules: https://help.salesforce.com/

Sharing Rule Options:

Sharing rules can be based on Roles, Roles and Subordinates, or Public Groups. They allow sharing records with users who meet specific criteria.

Why Option C is Correct:

Roles are a standard option for defining sharing rules, providing scalability and alignment with the organization's Role Hierarchy.

Why Others Are Incorrect:

Option A: Users cannot be directly selected in sharing rules.

Option B: Profiles cannot be selected in sharing rules.

For further details, refer to Salesforce Sharing Rule documentation: https://help.salesforce.com/

Field-Level Encryption and Sharing Rules:

When a field is encrypted using Salesforce Shield Platform Encryption, it is not available for sharing rules or criteria-based sharing because the encrypted field value is inaccessible for evaluations.

Why Option A is Correct:

The Social Security Number field is likely encrypted, which prevents it from being available in the sharing rule criteria.

Why Others Are Incorrect:

Option B: Field Level Security (FLS) affects visibility for the architect but does not determine availability in sharing rules.

Option C: Compliance fields are not a concept related to this issue.

For further reference, see Salesforce Shield Platform Encryption documentation: https://help.salesforce.com/