VMware VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Architect 2V0-13.25 Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (September 2025)

These are classicRecoverabilitymetrics. The Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO) directly relate to how fast and how much data can be recovered after a failure or disaster event. The architect must ensure the VCF deployment includes recovery mechanisms, such as stretched clusters or backup/replication technology, that meet these defined RTO/RPO targets.

VCF 9.0 design documentation specifies thatLACP-based link aggregationbetween ESXi and ToR switches is supported only whenLACP failback mode is configured, ensuring a link can pass traffic before LACP PDUs are received . Since the VMware team cannot change physical networking and aggregation is in place, the design must mandateLACP fallbackto maintain compatibility and connectivity resilience. Other answers are incorrect because VCF supports link aggregation in both management and workload domains if properly configured .

To trackconfiguration driftin VMware Cloud Foundation, the solution usesConfiguration Templatesand drift checks:

A: Template for the Management Cluster ensures cluster-level baseline is tracked.

B: Schedulingdrift checksevery 30 days ensures changes are detected.

D: Template forNSX Managerensures network and security components are included in drift detection.

C(Management vCenter) is not separately templated, it’s part of cluster drift.

E(remediation every 30 days) is not required — detection is enough.

F(Host Profiles) is vSphere-specific, not aligned with VCF’s drift management framework.

Asingle workload domain in VCFmaps to a single vCenter instance. When the host limit for that vCenter is reached (typically ~1000 hosts per vCenter), thecorrect and supported scale-out designis to deploy asecond VI workload domain, which comes with its own dedicated vCenter instance, allowing continued expansion without affecting the existing domain.

TheManaged Telegraf Agentprovides full observability and is centrally managed through VMware Aria Operations (formerly vRealize Operations). It is ideal for scenarios where both OS and infrastructure application metrics are needed, such as in theFully ManagedandOS Managedservices. This meets the requirement for monitoring while minimizing manual overhead. The Self-Managed service does not require agent deployment, as only VM-level metrics are needed.

Due to theexplicit constraint that no internet accessis permitted, the VCF Installer cannot connect to an online depot. Instead, the architect must use theoffline depot model, where binaries are downloaded externally and made accessiblelocally within the VCF environment(e.g., using a local web server).

This setup aligns with VMware's"air-gapped" deployment guidancefor VCF environments with strict security postures.

Availabilityrelates to ensuring services are continuously accessible, even in case of component failure.

Making management components (e.g., vCenter, NSX Manager, SDDC Manager) redundant guarantees higher availability.

Other qualities:

Performance= speed of execution.

Manageability= ease of administration.

Recoverability= ability to restore after failure (not redundancy itself).

Thus, the redundancy requirement directly maps toAvailability.

This statement expresses a financial limit — “Remaining budget” — constraining future expenditures on hardware. This is clearly aconstraint, as it restricts the design options (e.g., can't procure new hardware). In the VMware Conceptual Model framework, constraints are factors that limit design choices without introducing risk or goal definitions.

Thefirst workshopfocuses onunderstanding business drivers, objectives, and outcomesbefore diving into design specifics. VMware design methodology stresses that architects shouldstart with business requirementsand then move toward conceptual, logical, and physical designs.

A and Care premature — topology and design decisions should not be presented before business outcomes are captured.

Bfocuses on product features, which is technical and should come later.

Dis correct because identifyingbusiness objectivesensures the architecture aligns with customer goals.

The requirements specify:

Large-scale migration (800 workloads).

No downtime.

Strict change window (4 weeks).

HCX Replication Assisted vMotion (RAV)is the only method that combineslarge-scale migration efficiencywithzero downtime:

Workloads are replicated in advance.

During the cutover, avMotion-like switchovercompletes with no outage.

Other methods:

Cross vCenter vMotionworks for live moves but is not efficient forhundreds of VMswithin a short timeline.

HCX OS Assisted Migrationis for physical-to-virtual or non-vSphere workloads (not applicable).

HCX Bulk Migrationis efficient but introduces downtime during cutover.

Thus,HCX RAVbest meets the no-downtime, large-scale requirement.