VMware VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Architect 2V0-13.25 Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (October 2025)

According to the VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Network Latency and Fleet Expansion Guidelines, the maximum supported latency between VCF instances in a fleet is 100ms round-trip (refer to VCF-NET-REQD-LAT-006). Any latency exceeding this threshold can impact VCF Operations synchronization, NSX Federation communication, and lifecycle management tasks.

In this scenario, Datacenter A (90ms RTT) is within the 100ms limit, whereas Datacenter B (120ms RTT) exceeds it. Therefore, Datacenter A can host a new VCF instance within the existing VCF fleet, maintaining fleet-level manageability and minimal footprint. Datacenter B, on the other hand, requires a separate VCF fleet due to latency exceeding the supported limit.

This design ensures operational continuity while minimizing hardware footprint by using a hybrid deployment strategy — a fleet instance in Datacenter A and a standalone fleet in Datacenter B.

References (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide — “VCF Network Latency Requirements (VCF-NET-REQD-LAT-006)”

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Fleet Expansion Design Patterns — “Latency Considerations for Multi-Site VCF Deployments.”

Advanced Memory Tiering with NVMe optimizes memory performance, essential for workloads that are latency-sensitive.

NSX Enhanced Data Path (EDP) is specifically designed for high-performance, low-latency packet processing, critical in real-time applications.Options like Global Deduplication or Deep Snapshots can negatively impact latency due to additional processing overhead.

In VMware Cloud Foundation, each VI workload domain is backed by a single vCenter Server instance. By deploying multiple clusters within the same VI workload domain, the architect can support multiple use cases (e.g., separating prod/dev), without provisioning new vCenters. This design reduces management overhead and operational complexity.

However, if stricter separation is needed (e.g., multi-tenancy or lifecycle independence), separate workload domains may be more suitable. While vSAN is the default, it's not mandatory unless vSAN Ready Nodes are used for bring-up.

In the VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design and Architecture Framework, functional (business) requirements describe what the system must do — the specific behaviors, features, or services it must provide to meet business objectives.

The statement, “The solution must provide the ability for users to view and track the progress of their requests,” defines a business-driven functionality — the need for request visibility in the service catalog, directly impacting user experience and service operations.

By contrast:

Option B defines a Service Level Objective (SLO), categorized as a non-functional (performance) requirement.

Option C pertains to availability and resilience, a non-functional reliability requirement.

Option D is a security and compliance requirement, also non-functional.

Therefore, option A is the only one describing a functional capability — the system feature enabling users to monitor their service request lifecycle.

References (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide — “Functional vs. Non-Functional Requirements Classification.”

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.2 Architecture Guide — “Mapping Business Functional Requirements to Service Capabilities.”

---

Physical Switch MTU set to 9000 ensures optimal performance and reduced packet fragmentation for vSAN and NSX-T overlay networks—critical in HA scenarios.

vSAN Cache Tier Sizing at 800GB provides the necessary performance buffer to support high I/O operations and ensures continued service availability under failure or maintenance events.

Other options like DHCP lease time or NIC load-based routing do not directly influence availability SLA adherence.

In VMware’s Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design and Architecture Guide, design inputs are categorized into four classifications — requirements, constraints, assumptions, and risks. A constraint is defined as “a limiting factor that restricts the architect’s design choices or available options.”

The stakeholder statement dictates that “all new host server hardware must be deployed using our selected hardware vendor and server model,” which limits the architect’s ability to choose alternative hardware configurations. This statement explicitly restricts design flexibility and hardware options — hence, it is classified as a constraint.

VMware emphasizes that constraints are often based on corporate standards, vendor contracts, or compliance policies and must be adhered to during solution design. The architect must document such constraints clearly, as they directly influence hardware compatibility, procurement, and lifecycle management decisions.

References (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide — “Design Inputs: Requirements, Constraints, Assumptions, and Risks”

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Architecture Overview — “Hardware Vendor and Compatibility Constraints”

The VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Architecture Guide defines three levels of design abstraction — Conceptual, Logical, and Physical. The Physical Design translates logical components into tangible configuration and implementation details. VMware describes it as:

“The physical design includes the specific details for hardware models, network topologies, storage layouts, port configurations, VLAN IDs, and zoning of Fibre Channel fabrics.”

In contrast:

The Conceptual Design defines what the solution must deliver (high-level goals and relationships).

The Logical Design outlines component relationships and service flows without vendor-specific or configuration details.

Therefore, the Physical Design is where the architect defines server model types, port mappings, uplink configurations, vSAN disk group layouts, and Fibre Channel zones, all aligned to the validated VCF Bill of Materials (BOM).

References (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide — Conceptual, Logical, and Physical Design Definitions (pp. 79–81).

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.2 Architecture Overview — Physical Design Implementation Detailing Hardware and Network Configuration.

These are classic Recoverability metrics. The Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO) directly relate to how fast and how much data can be recovered after a failure or disaster event. The architect must ensure the VCF deployment includes recovery mechanisms, such as stretched clusters or backup/replication technology, that meet these defined RTO/RPO targets.

This statement expresses a financial limit — “Remaining budget” — constraining future expenditures on hardware. This is clearly a constraint, as it restricts the design options (e.g., can't procure new hardware). In the VMware Conceptual Model framework, constraints are factors that limit design choices without introducing risk or goal definitions.

To achieve 99.95% availability in the management domain, the architecture must protect critical management components (like vCenter) and ensure rapid recovery:

A. vCenter HA – Protects the vCenter Server by providing an active-passive-failure detection architecture, ensuring no single vCenter outage impacts operations.

D. Restart priority policy = High – Ensures vCenter recovers first and fastest during a host failure, minimizing downtime.

Why not the others?

B/E (EtherChannel Enable/Disable) – Link aggregation is networking config, not directly tied to SLA.

C (das.iostatsinterval = 0) – This disables HA datastore heartbeating, reducing resiliency rather than improving it.