iSQI ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level - Test Analyst (Syllabus 2019) CTAL-TA_Syll2019 Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (October 2025)

 Equivalence partitioning is a black-box test technique that divides the input domain of a system into partitions of equivalent data. Boundary value analysis is a technique that tests the boundaries of these partitions, where errors are more likely to occur. These techniques are suitable for testing the processing functionality of a critical traffic control system, as they can ensure that the system handles the input variables within the defined ranges and detects any invalid or out-of-range values. References = Black Box Testing Techniques: A Comprehensive Guide (Section 5.1 and 5.2), ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level Syllabus Technical Test Analyst (Section 3.2.1 and 3.2.2)

Use cases can be used for performance testing to measure the response time and throughput of the system under different workloads and scenarios. Use cases describe the process flows through the system based on its most likely use, which can help to simulate realistic user behavior and identify potential bottlenecks and performance issues.

References =

ISTQB Advanced Level Test Analyst Syllabus 2019, Section 3.2.2.2, page 411

How to write a performance test case | MyLoadTest2

Performance Testing Types, Steps, Best Practices, and Metrics - Stackify3

Installability testing is a type of non-functional testing that focuses on verifying that the software can be installed, upgraded, and uninstalled without errors or interruptions1. It is usually performed by a technical test analyst who has knowledge of the installation requirements, dependencies, and configurations2. The main objectives of installability testing are to ensure that the software is compatible with different platforms, environments, and hardware specifications, and that the installation and de-installation processes are functional, reliable, and secure3. Usability issues, such as the clarity, simplicity, and efficiency of the installation and de-installation user interfaces, are not the primary concern of installability testing, and may be better addressed by other types of testing, such as usability testing or user acceptance testing4. References = Installation testing - Wikipedia; ISTQB Advanced Level Technical Test Analyst Syllabus 2019, section 4.3.2; Mastering Installability Testing: A Key Software Quality Assurance Process; Installation Testing | Complete Overview Of Installation Testing

The correct answer isD.Automate the testing for the credit card exploratory tests so they can be used for confirmation testing after the defect is fixed.

A.Enter your exploratory test cases with detailed test steps into the Test Management System

This is incorrect because entering the test cases into the Test Management System is not enough to document and track the exploratory testing process. The test cases should also include the expected results, actual results, and defects found during the testing. Moreover, the test cases should be organized into a clear and logical structure that reflects the test charter and scope.

B.Close the session and start a new session with a new charter

This is incorrect because closing and starting a new session with a new charter would mean losing all the information and data collected during the previous session. This would make it difficult to resume and continue the testing process from where it left off. Instead, it would be better to use a consistent and stable session with a single charter that covers all the requirements and features of the system.

C.Continue the session and conduct the testing for debit cards

This is incorrect because continuing the session and conducting only one type of card (debit) would not provide a comprehensive coverage of all possible scenarios and outcomes of accepting credit cards. It would also limit the scope of testing to only one aspect of payment processing, which may not reflect all the business rules, validations, exceptions, or integrations involved in this domain.

D.Automate the testing for the credit card exploratory tests so they can be used for confirmation testing after the defect is fixed

This is correct because automating some or all of the exploratory tests can help to save time, effort, and resources by reducing manual effort and increasing efficiency. It can also help to improve accuracy, consistency, and reliability by eliminating human errors and biases. Moreover, automating some or all of the exploratory tests can enable them to be reused for confirmation testing after fixing any defects found during exploratory testing.Confirmation testing is a type of functional testing that verifies that all requirements are met by performing regression tests on previously tested functionality1.

The correct answer isD.Incorporate SUMI to provide objective usability acceptance criteria.

SUMI

SUMI stands for Software Usability Measurement Inventory, which is a questionnaire-based method for measuring user satisfaction with software products, including video games. SUMI can provide objective and reliable feedback on the usability aspects of the product, such as efficiency, effectiveness, learnability, helpfulness, and enjoyment.SUMI can also help to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the product and compare it with other similar products or benchmarks1.

References=

ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level Syllabus Test Analyst2, Section 3.2.2 Usability

ISTQB Test Analyst Syllabus and Study Guide3, Section 3.2.2 Usability

SUMI User Manual4, Section 1.1 What is SUMI?

Defect taxonomies are categorized lists of defects that can be used to identify and prevent common types of errors in software development and testing. They can also be used to design test cases that target specific defect types, such as security vulnerabilities. Therefore, using a list of known defect types to penetrate the security of computer systems is an example of the use of defect taxonomies. References = Defect Taxonomies - The Practical Guide to Defect Prevention (Chapter 10), Using Defect Taxonomies for Testing Requirements, Defect Based Approach using Defect Taxonomy, Requirements-based testing with defect taxonomies

The correct answer isC.Conduct pre-test interviews to give instructions to the users, and post-test interviews to get their feedback.

Pre-test and post-test interviews

Pre-test and post-test interviews are methods of usability testing that involve communicating with the business users before and after they test the application. Pre-test interviews can help to explain the purpose and scope of the test, provide instructions and guidance, and establish rapport with the users.Post-test interviews can help to collect feedback, opinions, and suggestions from the users, as well as identify any issues or problems they encountered during the test1.

References=

ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level Syllabus Test Analyst2, Section 3.2.2 Usability

ISTQB Test Analyst Syllabus and Study Guide3, Section 3.2.2 Usability

Usability Testing 101: A Guide for Businesses4, Section 5. How to Conduct a Usability Test

Testing pairs of combinations is a technique that reduces the number of test cases by testing only two factors at a time, instead of testing all possible combinations. Testing pairs of combinations is based on the assumption that most defects are caused by interactions of at most two factors. Testing pairs of combinations can be applied to this problem using the installation environments, which are the browsers, the operating systems, and the languages. By using testing pairs of combinations, the number of test cases will be lower than exhaustive testing, which would require testing every combination of factors. The formula for calculating the number of test cases for testing pairs of combinations is:

N = P * (P - 1) / 2

where N is the number of test cases, and P is the number of values for each factor. In this problem, P is 4, as there are four browsers, four operating systems, and four languages. Therefore, the number of test cases for testing pairs of combinations is:

N = 4 * (4 - 1) / 2 N = 4 * 3 / 2 N = 12 References =

ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level Syllabus Technical Test Analyst1, page 2

Pairwise Software Testing - GeeksforGeeks2, section “Introduction”

Pairwise Testing: A Best Practice That Isn’t3, section “Pairwise Testing”

State transition is a technique that analyzes the behavior of an application for different input conditions and how it changes from one state to another in response to events. It is useful for testing scenarios where the date of reservation is a critical factor that affects the system state and output1

References =

ISTQB Advanced Level Test Analyst Syllabus 2019, Section 3.2.2.3, page 432

State Transition Testing – Diagram & Technique (Example) - Guru993

State Transition Testing - GeeksforGeeks4