iSQI ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level - Automotive Software Tester CTFL-AuT Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (October 2025)

Test procedure specification

Test management report

Test metrics report

Load testing report

CTFL, ASPICE and ISO 26262 use the term .system' for a product consisting of a hardware and a software component

The following lest levels are equivalent: acceptance test (CTFL). ISO 26262 safety validation (ISO 26262.4-9) and system integration test (ASPICE SYS.4),

ASPICE and ISO 26262 do not have an equivalent for system testing (CTFL).

The following test levels are equivalent: component test (CTFL), software unit test (ISO 26262.6-9) and software component verification (ASPICE. SVYE.4).

Recruitment of additional employees

Use of experienced employees as coaches for new inexperienced employees

Creation of new subsidiaries(e g. Romania, India)

Use of several models as variants of a common platform

To determine the capacity of the product development process, ISO 26262 defines assessable requirements for these processes independently from the critically. For the development of E'E systems. ASPICE defines requirements for the processes and methods to be used by the tester depending on the ASIL.

For the development of E£ systems. ISO 26262 defines requirements for the processes and methods to be used by the tester depending on the ASH. To determine the capability of the product development process. ASPICE defines assessable requirements for these processes, independently from the critically

For the development of E/E systems, ISO 26262 defines requirements for the processes and methods to be used by the tester independently from the ASIL. To determine the capability of the product development process. ASPICE defines assessable requirements for those processes depending on the critically.

To determine the capability of the product development process, ISO 26262 defines requirements for the processes and methods to be used by the tester depending on the ASIL. For the development of E/E systems. ASPICE defines assessable requirements for the processes, Independently from the criticality.

The linking of requirements, test cases and test togs provides traceability and enables the desired verification of test cases for test case coverage

A1:N relation exists; for example If a test case is tested with the help of several requirements and is therefore linked to several requirements

The linking of a requirement, a derived test case and the associated test implementation provides the base for a complete testability.

With complete tractably It Is possible to trace test cases to their requirements and test cases which have been executed to their corresponding results.

The objective of using a Hi test environment is mainly to find non-functional errors in the model

The HIL test environment is as complex as a MiL or SiL test environment with regards to the complexity of its parts

Typically, the test for the coned behavior of a control unit's functions is performed on a component Hi.

In contrast to the MiL and Si test environments, pausing or stopping is possible in a HiL test environment thanks to a real the capable computer

The tester of the suppler must choose an appropriate combination of methods and explain Ms choice. The methods with a double plus symbol should be given higher consideration

Single plus symbol means .should be applied by the tester of the suppler", double plus symbol means "can be applied by the tester of the suppler".

A single plus symbol means .must be covered by each tester of the supplier'. double plus symbol means "must be tested for applicability by me tester of the contractor".

Single plus symbol means .must be applied by the tester of the suppler", double plus symbol means 'can be applied by the tester of the supplier

Tool supported static analysis

Hardware-in-the-Loop-Tests

Unit tests (Test of Software-Units)

Code-Reviews

For a MIL test environment NO environmental model is necessary

In the MIL test environment, stimulations and observations are possible anywhere via access points.

In the MIL test environment, the test object is available as compiled code and it is not readable by a human being.

In the MiL test environment, additional hardware is necessary to implement access points.

According to the general opinion of experts in functional safety, ISO 26262 CANNOT be considered as a contribution to the state of science and technology regarding the functional safety of road vehicles.

ISO 26262 Is part of Automotive SPICE® Therefore, conformity with ISO 26262 is checked as part of an Automotive SPICE®- assessment to avoid the additional effort of a separate safety audit

ISO 26262 is a standard for functional safety. It is a domain-specific adaption of IEC 61508 for the specific characteristics in the development of safety relevant electric-electronic systems for motor vehicles.

ISO 26262 is a security standard; thus, information and work security are core topics of ISO 26262.