Cisco Conducting Forensic Analysis and Incident Response Using Cisco CyberOps Technologies (CBRFIR) 300-215 Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (October 2025)

The string in the exhibit is a classic example of Base64 encoding. Base64 is used to encode binary data into ASCII characters, making it suitable for transmitting data over media that are designed to deal with textual data. It typically ends with one or two equal signs=(padding), which this string does. This format is commonly seen in obfuscated payloads or malware communications in the wild.

During the initial phase of incident response, the two key actions are:

Disconnecting the server (B) to contain the threat and prevent lateral movement or further exfiltration.

Reviewing network logs (E) to understand the timeline and scope of the attack.

These are emphasized in the containment and detection stages of the incident response lifecycle outlined in NIST 800-61 and covered in the Cisco CyberOps training.

—

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

From the exhibit, Cisco Secure Malware Analytics (formerly Threat Grid) has captured outbound HTTP POST communication to the IP address 51.38.124.206 on port 80. This destination is highlighted in the analysis under “Outbound HTTP POST Communications,” indicating exfiltration behavior or command-and-control (C2) signaling.

Key indicators:

The report shows that binary data was POSTed to this IP.

The source system generated 22 packets and sent 6,192 bytes.

The system has flagged the behavior with a severity of 25 and confidence of 25—suggesting that this is an IoC worth acting on.

Therefore, the artifacts suggest that the destination IP 51.38.124.206 is involved in malicious activity, and the correct answer is:

Answer: A. Destination IP 51.38.124.206 is identified as malicious.

Dynamic malware analysis involves executing the malware in a controlled environment to observe its behavior, such as file creation, network traffic, or system modifications. Asandboxis designed for this purpose—it safely executes and monitors suspicious code without risking the host system. The other tools (Decompiler, Unpacker, Disassembler) are primarily used in static analysis.

Correct answer: D. Sandbox

—

The event log shown in the exhibit isEvent ID 104, which in Windows indicates"The audit log was cleared."This is a significant indicator oflog tampering, a common post-exploitation technique used by attackers to hide their tracks after exfiltrating data or performing unauthorized actions.

The Cisco CyberOps Associate guide mentions:

"Log deletion events, especially Event ID 104, should be treated as potential evidence of malicious activity attempting to cover tracks".

Combined with large data dumps to network shares, this indicates not only unauthorized activity but also deliberate efforts to erase forensic evidence—characteristic oflog tampering.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The exhibit lists several behaviors under categories such as Remote Access, Stealer/Phishing, Persistence, and Evasive Marks. Notably, under “Persistence” it states:

“Writes data to a remote process”

This behavior is indicative of “process injection,” a technique where malware writes or injects malicious code into the address space of another process. This allows the malware to evade detection and run within the context of a legitimate process.

This matches the MITRE ATT&CK technique T1055 (Process Injection), which is also discussed in the Cisco CyberOps Associate guide under evasion and persistence tactics used by malware.

While modified registry and data compression are possible signs of malware, they are not explicitly referenced in the exhibit. The definitive indicator shown is related to process injection.

Therefore, the correct answer is: C. process injection.

The provided log file contains multiple HTTP GET requests attempting to access various directories and files on the web server such as:

/balance

/security

/finance

/secret

/opt

/fuzzer/admin

These requests appear to be sequential, systematically targeting commonly used file and directory paths. The response codes are mostly 404 (Not Found) and a few 301s, indicating that the requester is trying different permutations of paths to discover hidden or vulnerable endpoints. This behavior is consistent withdirectory fuzzing, a reconnaissance technique used by attackers (or automated tools) to map out web directory structures by sending a high volume of crafted requests to guess hidden or unlinked directories and files.

This is distinct from DDoS (which would manifest as volume-based access issues), SQL injection (which targets specific parameters within requests), or botnet infection (which generally involves command-and-control communication or massive traffic floods).

The string shown is long, alphanumeric, and includes both uppercase and lowercase letters with numbers—characteristics of Base64 encoding. This format is widely used to obfuscate payloads in malicious scripts, particularly in phishing or malware campaigns. Base64 encoding is also supported by Python and other platforms for data transformation.

—

Process Explorer is an advanced Windows-based utility that shows real-time data about running processes, CPU usage, services, DLLs, and handles. It is specifically designed for this kind of investigation and is part of the Sysinternals Suite.

The alert clearly identifies ET SCAN DirBuster Web App Scan in Progress, referencingSID 2008186, which is a Snort signature that specifically detectsDirBusteractivity. DirBuster is a well-known tool used for brute-forcing hidden directories and files on web servers.

The Cisco CyberOps Associate guide and OWASP both identifydirectory brute-forcingas a reconnaissance technique to find unprotected or misconfigured endpoints on web applications, typically prior to launching deeper attacks.

Therefore, the correct interpretation of the alert is:

C. brute-force attack against directories and files on the target webserver.