Fortinet Fortinet NSE 4 - FortiOS 7.6 Administrator NSE4_FGT_AD-7.6 Exam Dumps: Updated Questions & Answers (July 2026)

From the routing table in the exhibit, there is already a static route for 172.20.1.0/24 pointing out port3 with:

Distance = 9

Priority = 2

Type = Static

In FortiOS, route selection prefers (in order) the route with the lowest administrative distance to a destination. Therefore, to make traffic to 172.20.1.0/24 go through port2 only, the administrator must ensure the port2 static route is more preferred than the existing port3 route.

Why C is correct

C. The existing static route through port3 must have the distance set to 11.

If the existing port3 route distance is increased to 11, then a new port2 route with distance 9 will be preferred (9 < 11). This makes the port3 route a backup route instead of the active one.

Why D is correct

D. The new static route must have the distance set to 9

Setting the new port2 route distance to 9 (and increasing the port3 route to 11 as in option C) ensures FortiGate selects the port2 route as the best route for 172.20.1.0/24.

Why A and B are not correct

A (priority 3): By itself it does not guarantee selection over the existing route, and FortiOS route choice is driven primarily by distance.

B (metric 1): Metric is not the primary selector for static route preference compared to administrative distance in this scenario.

So the two criteria that achieve the objective are:

Make the existing port3 route less preferred by increasing its distance (C)

Ensure the new port2 route uses the preferred distance (D)

The exhibit shows the output of the following command:

diagnose test application ipsmonitor 1

pid = 2044, engine count = 0 (+1)

0 - pid:2074:2074 cfg:1 master:0 run:1

How to interpret this output (FortiOS 7.6 – IPS internals)

ipsmonitor displays the status of IPS engines running on the FortiGate.

engine count = 0 means:

No IPS scanning engines are currently active

IPS is not processing any traffic

In FortiOS, IPS engines are started on demand.

Critical documented behavior

IPS processes are only spawned when at least one firewall policy is configured with an IPS profile and traffic matches that policy.

If no firewall policy references an IPS profile, the IPS engine:

Does not start

Shows engine count = 0

Appears “not working,” even though the IPS profile exists

This is exactly what the diagnose output indicates.

Why option A is correct

A. There is no firewall policy configured with an IPS security profile.

Creating an IPS profile alone is not sufficient

IPS must be applied to an active firewall policy

Traffic must match that policy for the IPS engine to run

Otherwise, ipsmonitor will show engine count = 0

This matches FortiOS 7.6 IPS operational behavior.

Why the other options are incorrect

B. Administrator entered the command diagnose test application ipsmonitor 5.

Incorrect.

The exhibit clearly shows ipsmonitor 1

Using a different argument would not explain engine count = 0

C. FortiGate entered into IPS fail open state.

Incorrect.

In fail-open, IPS engines may be bypassed, but they still initialize

engine count = 0 specifically indicates IPS is not in use at all

D. Administrator entered the command diagnose test application ipsmonitor 99.

Incorrect.

The command argument affects debug level, not engine creation

Again, the exhibit shows ipsmonitor 1

According to the FortiOS 7.6 Troubleshooting and Administration guides, the diagnose debug flow command provides a step-by-step trace of how the FortiGate unit processes a packet.

First, the line " find a route: flag=00000000 gw-0.0.0.0 via port2 " indicates that during the routing table lookup, the FortiGate matched the destination against its default route (represented by 0.0.0.0) and determined that the egress interface is port2 . This confirms that the default gateway for this traffic is reachable via port2 (Statement A).

Second, the debug trace concludes with the messages " policy-2 Is matched, act-drop " and " Denied by forward policy check (policy 2) " . This explicitly indicates that the packet successfully matched the criteria for firewall policy ID 2, and the action configured for that policy is set to Deny (Statement D).

Statement B is incorrect because a Reverse Path Forwarding (RPF) failure would be indicated by a specific " reverse path check fail, drop " message, which is absent here. Statement C is incorrect because the output shows " proto=1 " , which corresponds to ICMP (Ping) traffic. UDP traffic would be identified as protocol 17.

“Three different configurable thresholds define when FortiGate enters and exits conserve mode. If memory usage goes above the percentage of total RAM defined as the red threshold , FortiGate enters conserve mode.”

“If memory usage keeps increasing, it might exceed the extreme threshold . While memory usage is above this highest threshold, all new sessions are dropped. ”

“What actions does FortiGate take to preserve memory while in conserve mode?

• FortiGate does not accept configuration changes , because they might increase memory usage.”

“However, if the memory usage exceeds the extreme threshold, new sessions are always dropped , regardless of the FortiGate configuration.”

Technical Deep Dive:

The system performance output shows Memory: 2042076k total, 1837868k used (90%) . The configured thresholds shown are:

green = 82

red = 88

extreme = 89

Because memory usage is 90% , it is:

Above the red threshold (88%) → so FortiGate has entered conserve mode

Above the extreme threshold (89%) → so all new sessions are dropped

That makes A and D correct.

Why the others are wrong:

B is not stated anywhere in the study guide as an automatic outcome of conserve mode.

C is the opposite of what the guide says. In conserve mode, FortiGate does not accept configuration changes .

A useful verification command is:

diagnose hardware sysinfo conserve

Operationally, once a FortiGate crosses the red threshold , it starts protecting itself by limiting behavior that could increase memory usage. Once it crosses the extreme threshold , it becomes more severe and drops new sessions to keep the system from becoming unstable.

From the exhibits:

The Web Filter profile is configured with Feature set = Flow-based.

The Firewall policy is configured with Inspection mode = Proxy-based and has Web Filter enabled.

In FortiOS 7.6, security profiles that have a feature set selection (Flow-based vs Proxy-based) must match the inspection mode used by the firewall policy. If the profile’s feature set does not match the policy’s inspection mode, the profile behavior will not align with what the administrator expects (and in many cases FortiOS will prevent correct use/selection, or the feature behavior will not apply as intended).

That mismatch explains why the configured URL filter entry for www.facebook.com (set to Monitor) is not producing the expected result, and instead the session is being evaluated by category rating and blocked (shown as Malicious Websites on the FortiGuard block page).

Why the other options are not the best fit:

A: A web rating override is not shown in the exhibits, and nothing indicates an override misconfiguration.

C: While the policy inspection mode could be changed, the root cause shown is the profile feature set mismatch (profile is Flow-based).

D: The URL filter action shown is Monitor, which would not produce a block page by itself.

FortiGate CNF in AWS uses a Gateway Load Balancer endpoint (GWLBe) in the protected VPC to steer workload traffic toward the FortiGate CNF service for inspection. The EC2 instance does not send traffic directly to the internet gateway first, and the CNF is not placed inline as a normal VM firewall inside the EC2 subnet. Instead, AWS routing sends the EC2 traffic to the relevant GWLBe. The traffic is then forwarded to FortiGate CNF, where security policies are evaluated and enforced. If the traffic is allowed, it is returned to the same GWLBe and then continues toward the internet gateway. Therefore, the correct traffic path is EC2 instance → GWLBe → FortiGate CNF → GWLBe → IGW → internet.

“When you create a new entry to add signatures or filters, you can select the action by clicking Action.”

“When you enable Packet logging , FortiGate stores a local copy of the packet that matches the signature . This enhances the view of erroneous or suspicious packets.”

“You can configure IP exemptions on individual signatures only .”

Technical Deep Dive:

The correct answer is C .

The exhibit shows an IPS entry being added with:

Type = Signature

Action = Block

Packet logging = Enable

Rate-based settings = Default

The most certain conclusion from that configuration is that packet logging is enabled , and the study guide explicitly states that this causes FortiGate to store a local copy of the matching packet .

Why the others are wrong:

A is wrong because the exhibit shows Rate-based settings = Default , not a custom threshold.

B is wrong because the configured action is Block , not allow/monitor.

D is wrong because the entry type is Signature , meaning an individual signature is being added, not a signature group.

A useful operational note: packet logging is powerful for IPS investigation and false-positive analysis, but it consumes more storage and processing resources. It should be enabled selectively on signatures where deeper forensic visibility is needed.